|
|
ARCHIVE: 'Phage List' - Archives (1988 - 1989)
DOCUMENT: phage #039 [possible Ultrix immunity?] (1 message, 816 bytes)
SOURCE: http://securitydigest.org/exec/display?f=phage/archive/039.txt&t=text/plain
NOTICE: securitydigest.org recognises the rights of all third-party works.
START OF DOCUMENT
From: "Martha S. Rose" <strata%FENCHURCH.MIT.EDU@eddie.mit.edu>
To: phage
Date: Fri 16:06:09 04/11/1988 EST
Subject: possible Ultrix immunity?
References:
[Thread Prev: 383]
[Thread Next: 040]
[Message Prev: 041]
[Message Next: 042]
Considering how many sites (such as CMU and Eddie) that have had infections and know about our two Ultrix machines, I'm surprised that cogito.mit.edu and psyche.mit.edu haven't yet been affected. I've seen a couple of suspicious processes (such as a sendmail with 364.5 seconds of CPU time!) over the last couple of days but no signs of infection. I've only recently started maintaining these machines, and they're still running Ultrix 1.2 (ack! pththt!), which may explain this. My sendmails were without the debug option already. BTW, Spaf, could you put me on your lists (newsgurus, phage, etc) in specific, as "strata@eddie.mit.edu"? The listing of "postmaster@eddie" should stay on for Jeff Siegal and others who read it until they put themselves on specifically. Given the kinds of info going around here, I agree with the suggestions that aliases such as "postmaster" be phased out... _Strata * * * * * * * * * Martha S. Rose \|/\|/\|/\|/\|/\|/\|/\|/\|/ postmaster@eddie.mit.edu MIT EECS ECF [{backbones}!mit-eddie!strata] strata@eddie.mit.edu ############################################################################### ~
END OF DOCUMENT
ISSN 1742-948X 01 (Online) | 2005/03/01 | Copyright 2002-2008 securitydigest.org. All rights reserved. |