ARCHIVE: 'Phage List' - Archives (1988 - 1989)
DOCUMENT: phage #069 [Re: Disassembled virus?] (1 message, 889 bytes)
NOTICE: securitydigest.org recognises the rights of all third-party works.
START OF DOCUMENT
From: rick@seismo.CSS.GOV (Rick Adams)
Date: Sun 00:19:46 06/11/1988 EST
Subject: Re: Disassembled virus?
References: [Thread Prev: 059] [Thread Next: 074] [Message Prev: 068] [Message Next: 070]
Keith, I rarely disagree with you this strongly, but frankly I'm rather pissed off at you. I and probably at least a dozen other people on this list are quite capable of decompiling the virus without your help. I am also quite capable of writing one from scratch that's a least as good and probably better. (I, for example, would be damned sure to attack ftpd with you know what). The challenge, from my point of view would be to do it so that I couldn't be traced. Writing the actual virus is childs play by comparison. This "trust me, I know whats good for you" attitude is something I would expect from IBM or ATT, but not Berkeley. Why don't you stop the rest of us from wasting their valuable time duplicating work that you have already done. We're adults. Really. The truly comical part is you actually think that keeping the source to your self makes any difference. One of the basic tenets of computer security is that security through obscurity DOES NOT WORK. Now I'm tempted to submit a paper to the next USENIX conference that goes into explicit detail about how best to write a virus for Berkeley UNIX. It would be my way of "flipping you off". --rick
END OF DOCUMENT
|ISSN 1742-948X 01 (Online) | 2005/03/01 | Copyright 2002-2008 securitydigest.org. All rights reserved.|