The 'Security Digest' Archives (TM)

Archive: About | Browse | Search | Contributions | Feedback
Site: Help | Index | Search | Contact | Notices | Changes

ARCHIVE: 'Phage List' - Archives (1988 - 1989)
DOCUMENT: phage #224 [[no subject]] (1 message, 680 bytes)
SOURCE: http://securitydigest.org/exec/display?f=phage/archive/224.txt&t=text/plain
NOTICE: securitydigest.org recognises the rights of all third-party works.

START OF DOCUMENT

From: der Mouse <mouse@Larry.McRCIM.McGill.EDU>
To: phage
Date: Thu 01:29:12 10/11/1988 EST
Subject: [no subject]
References: [Thread Prev: 103] [Thread Next: 229] [Message Prev: 219] [Message Next: 226]

> From: Bill Sommerfeld <wesommer@athena.mit.edu>
>> From: comer@purdue.edu (Douglas Comer)

>> The ONLY thing that will discourage copy-cats is severe punishment
>> for the author.

> There may be the possibility of criminal suits; since the virus
> reportedly left the country, the author violated U. S. export
> regulations (the binary contained a copy of crypt(), which is a
> DES-derived encryption algorithm).

The login program, which is shipped with every UNIX system in
existence, also contains (indeed, *must* contain) the same algorithm.
Thus the target system can be presumed to already have exactly that
code on it.

Oh, that's right, I forgot.  We're talking about US Government
restrictions.  They don't have to make sense.

					der Mouse

			old: mcgill-vision!mouse
			new: mouse@larry.mcrcim.mcgill.edu

END OF DOCUMENT