|
|
ARCHIVE: TCP-IP Distribution List - Archives (1982)
DOCUMENT: TCP-IP Distribution List for November 1982 (8 messages, 12903 bytes)
SOURCE: http://securitydigest.org/exec/display?f=tcp-ip/archive/1982/11.txt&t=text/plain
NOTICE: securitydigest.org recognises the rights of all third-party works.
START OF DOCUMENT
-----------[000000][next][prev][last][first]---------------------------------------------------- Date: 1 Nov 1982 From: TCP-IP at BRL To: TCP-IP at BRL Subject: TCP-IP Digest, Vol 1 #24
TCP/IP Digest Monday, 1 Nov 1982 Volume 1 : Issue 24
Today's Topics:
SRI 2.8 BSD with TCP/IP for PDP-11s now being distributed.
Clarification about DTI TCP/IP product "ACCESS"
Courier: The Remote Procedure Call Protocol: In InterNet?
TCP-only throughput figures of ArpaNet
DCEC gateway up on SatNet!
Results of DCEC Gateway Test
Looking for DECNet between UNIX and VMS on VAXen.
Looking for TCP/IP for Bell UNIX System III
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
For Research Use Only --- Not for Public Distribution
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 13 Oct 1982 at 2322-PDT
From: Bill Croft <croft@Sri-Tsc>
Subject: distribution announcement
Distribution of 2.8 BSD with TCP/IP.
Our port of the 4.1a BSD VAX networking code to the PDP11/44 or /70 is now
essentially complete. We have been running the software on our SRI-PRMH
and SRI-WARF systems for about a month now with very good results. The
local net drivers tested and running at this time are: INTERLAN 10 megabit
ethernet, ACC LH-DH, and our locally built SRI1822. Converting an existing
VAX network device driver to run with the 11 requires editing just a few
lines. The DEC IMP11A driver has been converted but not yet tested.
I wish we had the time to make this distribution a really polished one, but
we don't. We make the assumption that you already have installed 2.8 BSD
on your machine, and understand kernel configuration and debugging. If you
brought up an early 2.8 distribution, I think you qualify.
To avoid licensing difficulties, we are restricting distribution to holders
of Berkeley UNIX licenses (x.x BSD). Within a few months we hope that the
PDP11 group at Berkeley can take over and incorporate this distribution
into their next 2.82 release. We are making this release available from
SRI due to the fast approaching ARPA TCP conversion deadline. The tape we
can send you contains the new kernel, user level network code, and other
necessary tools (such as "cpp" from the VAX that understands long
identifier names).
Here is a copy of the entry recently submitted to SRI-NIC, for the
"tcp-ip-status.txt" document:
5. SRI UNIX 11/44,11/70 V7 (2.8 BSD)
Date: 13 October 1982
From: Bill Croft <croft at sri-tsc>
This TCP was ported from the Berkeley VAX 4.1a version. IP, TCP, ICMP,
UDP, and RAW layers are all kernel resident. This means we can run
faster than older PDP11 TCPs that require auxiliary daemons (such as
BBN's V6 or 3COM's UNET). Typical TCP interprocess thruput between a VAX
750 running 4.1a BSD and the 11/44 running 2.8 BSD is 300000 baud;
this was measured with INTERLAN 10 megabit ethernet hardware.
For programmers, there is easy access to all layers of protocol, so
that (e.g.) IP or UDP services can be written. Service protocols
available are all of those supplied with the VAX version: FTP, TELNET,
ECHO, rlogin, rsh, rexec, talk, routing daemons.
1. Hardware - currently requires an I/D machine, such as an 11/44
or 11/70 with at least a half megabyte of memory. The total kernel
size (text, data, and buffers) is about 200K bytes; so it won't
fit if you have only 256K bytes. Although this sounds like a lot
of bytes, comparison with our older 2.8 BSD NCP-only system shows
that the kernel has only grown by about 60K bytes. This is very
reasonable considering that the entire network is now resident
versus the NCP case which used a hulking NCP daemon.
A number of net interfaces are supported. See the Berkeley VAX
documentation. The ones specifically ported to the 11 are:
INTERLAN 10 megabit ethernet, ACC LH/DH, SRI 1822, DEC IMP11A.
Porting a new VAX interface driver to the 11 involves changing
less than 10 lines of code.
2. Software - ported from the 4.1a Berkeley VAX UNIX system.
Manipulates I and D space mapping registers to reference more than
65K bytes of instructions and data at a time.
3. Documentation - supplied on tape as manual pages.
Contact for further information: Dan Chernikoff, dan@sri-tsc, (415) 859
4144. We can mail a copy of our distribution tape. Eventually the
software will be incorporated in Berkeley's next PDP11 distribution
(2.82 BSD). This tape is supplied as-is to 2.8 BSD licenses, with no
warrantees or support expressed or implied. The terms of your original
Berkeley license apply: the software cannot be resold or redistributed.
To get the software, send a magnetic tape and a copy of your 2.8 or 4.x
license to:
Dan Chernikoff
SRI International
333 Ravenswood Ave.
Menlo Park, CA 94025
As far as updates and bug fixes go, this mailing list (ucbtcp11@sri-tsc)
can be used as a distribution point. Send a note to dan@sri-tsc to
add or delete names from the list.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1982 1703-CDT
From: grg at Dti (Gary Grossman)
Subject: TCP/IP for VAX/VMS
This is to clarify a misconception that might be fostered by the note
from Y. Pin Foo in TCP-IP Digest #1:23. Digital Technology Incorporated (DTI)
does indeed market software including TCP/IP under the name "ACCESS".
Our software is available for connection to the ARPANET via the ACC LH/DH-11.
It is also available in an Ethernet version using 3COM's Unibus Ethernet
interface.
The only 3COM software that we use is the device driver that is supplied
with the 3COM hardware. All other software, including IP, TCP, TELNET,
FTP, and MAIL, was produced at DTI.
The first copy of the software package costs $15K. Additional copies
to the same site cost $6K.
Gary Grossman
------------------------------
Date: 18 Oct 1982 13:10:48-EST
From: Chris Kent <cak@Purdue>
Via: Brl; 18 Oct 82 15:20-EDT
Am in the process of reading this "Xerox System Integration Standard",
and was wondering if anyone had thought about implementing this on top
of IP and/or TCP... and what progress you've made.
Cheers,
chris
------------------------------
Date: 7 Oct 1982 9:01:06 EDT (Thursday)
From: Andrew Malis <malis at BBN-UNIX>
Subject: TCP-only throughput figures
Mike,
Vint Cerf suggested that you may be interested in including the
following figures in some form in the TCP-IP digest. Basically,
they are a comparison of the number of packets going through the
net during the TCP-only test, as compared to the previous day
during the same time period. They show that during the test, the
network had about 47% of the number of packets flowing as it did
during the previous day at the same time.
You may want to include the figures as is, or you may want to
just present the totals. I'll leave that up to you.
Andy Malis
HOST THROUGHPUT SUMMARY, OCTOBER 1ST
Packets Received
Inter-node Intra-Node Total
From Fri Oct 1 12:13:51 1982
To Fri Oct 1 13:02:44 1982
Net Totals: 338765 33679 372444
From Fri Oct 1 13:02:46 1982
To Fri Oct 1 13:51:39 1982
Net Totals: 336164 82056 418220
From Fri Oct 1 13:51:39 1982
To Fri Oct 1 14:40:32 1982
Net Totals: 446443 40376 486819
From Fri Oct 1 14:40:34 1982
To Fri Oct 1 15:29:27 1982
Net Totals: 451627 66647 518274
From Fri Oct 1 15:29:27 1982
To Fri Oct 1 16:00:00 1982
Net Totals: 399462 42043 441505
________________________________________
Net Totals: 1972461 264801 2237262
========================================================
HOST THROUGHPUT SUMMARY, SEPTEMBER 30TH
Packets Received
Inter-node Intra-Node Total
From Thu Sep 30 12:17:18 1982
To Thu Sep 30 13:06:11 1982
Net Totals: 662445 74644 737089
From Thu Sep 30 13:06:19 1982
To Thu Sep 30 13:55:12 1982
Net Totals: 671169 174553 845722
From Thu Sep 30 13:55:14 1982
To Thu Sep 30 14:44:07 1982
Net Totals: 823234 156222 979456
From Thu Sep 30 14:44:17 1982
To Thu Sep 30 15:33:10 1982
Net Totals: 905026 138187 1043213
From Thu Sep 30 15:33:07 1982
To Thu Sep 30 16:00:00 1982
Net Totals: 987427 132308 1119735
________________________________________
Net Totals: 4049301 675914 4725215
------------------------------
Date: 26 Oct 1982 18:55:33 EDT (Tuesday)
From: Michael Brescia <brescia@Bbn-Unix>
To: Cain at Edn-Unix, mcneill at Bbn-Unix, control at Bbn-Unix
Subject: DCEC gateway up on satnet
Redistributed-by: Bob Hinden <hinden@Bbn-Unix>
Redistributed-to: gateway-info at BBN-UNIX
Redistributed-date: 27 Oct 1982 8:49:50 EDT (Wednesday)
Gateway 15 DCEC 10.1.0.20 (Arpanet) Tue Oct 26 18:47:25 1982
Version 1002
Interfaces:
UP: DCEC 4.0.0.24 (Satnet) !!!!!!!!
UP: DCEC 10.1.0.20 (Arpanet)
UP: DCEC 21.0.0.2 (EDN)
Neighbors:
UP: NTARE 4.0.0.38 (Satnet) !!!!!!
UP: UCL 4.0.0.60 (Satnet) !!!!
...
gstatus terminated at Tue Oct 26 18:47:26 1982
------
thanks to dale, peter, mike, mike, bill, cathy, &c, and WUI
The line from DCEC to ETAM has come up for real. DCEC gateway sees the
satnet, and also its satnet neighbors. That ought to create real fun for
the gateway routing.
We expect to watch this for a while to make sure it settles in for good.
Mike
------------------------------
Date: 29 Oct 1982 11:18:37 EDT (Friday)
From: Bob Hinden <hinden@Bbn-Unix>
Subject: Results of DCEC Gateway Test
To: gateway-info at Bbn-Unix
Yesterdays test, which consisted of looping away the VDH line of the
BBN gateway, was very successfull. All the traffic which normally
used the BBN gateway as a route between Satnet and the Arpanet was
redirected to the DCEC gateway. I have included throughput data for
the period before and during the test, showing that the traffic
load switched to the DCEC gateway after the VDH line was looped.
[ Here is the correct throughput data for the DCEC gateway test.
The first message included the data for the period before the
test twice. -Bob Hinden ]
Throughput Summary from 0300 to 0900 EST 28 Oct 82
GWY GWY RCVD RCVD IP % IP DEST % DST
NO. NAME DGRAMS BYTES ERRORS ERRORS UNRCH UNRCH
2 BBN 77,702 3,328,454 0 0.00% 8 0.01%
15 DCEC 54,625 2,342,132 0 0.00% 13 0.02%
TOTALS 132,327 5,670,586 0 0.00% 21 0.02%
GWY GWY SENT SENT DROPPED % DROPPED
NO. NAME DGRAMS BYTES DGRAMS DGRAMS
2 BBN 82,797 3,417,237 0 0.00%
15 DCEC 53,983 2,222,390 0 0.00%
TOTALS 136,780 5,639,627 0 0.00%
Throughput Summary 0900 to 1500 EST 28 Oct 82
GWY GWY RCVD RCVD IP % IP DEST % DST
NO. NAME DGRAMS BYTES ERRORS ERRORS UNRCH UNRCH
2 BBN 43,025 1,265,324 1 0.00% 19 0.04%
15 DCEC 101,881 4,979,852 1 0.00% 154 0.15%
TOTALS 144,906 6,245,176 2 0.00% 173 0.12%
GWY GWY SENT SENT DROPPED % DROPPED
NO. NAME DGRAMS BYTES DGRAMS DGRAMS
2 BBN 49,409 1,402,482 0 0.00%
15 DCEC 102,607 4,873,176 4 0.00%
TOTALS 152,016 6,275,658 4 0.00%
We are now seeing evidence that having two gateways between the
Arpanet and Satnet is improving the quality of service for the Satnet
users. This in conjuction with some TCP fixes made to the TAC
software should result in more reliable service.
Bob
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 82 15:46:52 CDT
From: estell at NWC-387B
Subject: VMS to UNIX software for DECNet
We are looking for a reliable and affordable software package that implements
a "DEC Net" interface between a UNIX host and a VMS host (both VAX computers).
The idea is that, if we must have UNIX as an ARPANET interface, we want to
be able to connect that host VAX to our other VAX computers, via DECNet.
Also, we have a VAX here at NWC that is running UNIX now; someday they may
want to join our NWCNet (LAN), via "DEC Net."
Do you know of such software?
If not, do you WANT to know about it? (i.e., If I go hunting, do you want
to be informed of my findings?)
Please reply to ESTELL at NWC-387B.
Thanks,
Bob
------------------------------
Date: 15 Oct 82 13:42:29-EDT (Fri)
From: Rick <rturner.xls-onyx02@Udel-Relay>
To: tcp-ip at BRL
cc: unix-wizards at Sri-Unix
Subject: TCP/IP &/or NCP for 3.0 UNIX
We are running UNIX 3.0 on an 11/70 and we're trying to get it running on the
net. We are currently using the CSNET as a gateway to Arpanet, but want
to get our system(s) directly into it.
We are looking at various places to get a reasonable NCP (short-term) and
TCP/IP (longer) that we can port over to 3.0. Is there anyone else out
there in UNIX-land who is trying to get to NCP and/or TCP/IP under these
circumstances?
rick
------------------------------
Date: 18 Oct 1982 23:28:47-EST
From: Chris Kent <cak@Purdue>
Reply-to: cak at Purdue
To: rturner.xls-onyx02 at Udel-Relay, tcp-ip at BRL
Subject: Re: TCP/IP &/or NCP for 3.0 UNIX
Seems like you could get the Greep NCP front end that runs on VAXen
to work. But I'm not sure it would be worth the effort for a little
over two months of access.
As for TCP, you might want to look at the work that Bill Croft has
just completed. Are you tied to a 3.0 kernel? If not, you can
just put his up (it's based on 2.8bsd). Otherwise, you have some
work to do, but his code should be a good guideline.
Cheers,
chris
------------------------------
END OF TCP-IP DIGEST
********************
-----------[000001][next][prev][last][first]---------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu Nov 4 07:16:32 1982 From: TCP-IP@BRL To: fa.tcp-ip Subject: TCP-IP Digest, Vol 1 #24
TCP/IP Digest Monday, 1 Nov 1982 Volume 1 : Issue 24
Today's Topics:
SRI 2.8 BSD with TCP/IP for PDP-11s now being distributed.
Clarification about DTI TCP/IP product "ACCESS"
Courier: The Remote Procedure Call Protocol: In InterNet?
TCP-only throughput figures of ArpaNet
DCEC gateway up on SatNet!
Results of DCEC Gateway Test
Looking for DECNet between UNIX and VMS on VAXen.
Looking for TCP/IP for Bell UNIX System III
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
For Research Use Only --- Not for Public Distribution
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 13 Oct 1982 at 2322-PDT
From: Bill Croft <croft@Sri-Tsc>
Subject: distribution announcement
Distribution of 2.8 BSD with TCP/IP.
Our port of the 4.1a BSD VAX networking code to the PDP11/44 or /70 is now
essentially complete. We have been running the software on our SRI-PRMH
and SRI-WARF systems for about a month now with very good results. The
local net drivers tested and running at this time are: INTERLAN 10 megabit
ethernet, ACC LH-DH, and our locally built SRI1822. Converting an existing
VAX network device driver to run with the 11 requires editing just a few
lines. The DEC IMP11A driver has been converted but not yet tested.
I wish we had the time to make this distribution a really polished one, but
we don't. We make the assumption that you already have installed 2.8 BSD
on your machine, and understand kernel configuration and debugging. If you
brought up an early 2.8 distribution, I think you qualify.
To avoid licensing difficulties, we are restricting distribution to holders
of Berkeley UNIX licenses (x.x BSD). Within a few months we hope that the
PDP11 group at Berkeley can take over and incorporate this distribution
into their next 2.82 release. We are making this release available from
SRI due to the fast approaching ARPA TCP conversion deadline. The tape we
can send you contains the new kernel, user level network code, and other
necessary tools (such as "cpp" from the VAX that understands long
identifier names).
Here is a copy of the entry recently submitted to SRI-NIC, for the
"tcp-ip-status.txt" document:
5. SRI UNIX 11/44,11/70 V7 (2.8 BSD)
Date: 13 October 1982
From: Bill Croft <croft at sri-tsc>
This TCP was ported from the Berkeley VAX 4.1a version. IP, TCP, ICMP,
UDP, and RAW layers are all kernel resident. This means we can run
faster than older PDP11 TCPs that require auxiliary daemons (such as
BBN's V6 or 3COM's UNET). Typical TCP interprocess thruput between a VAX
750 running 4.1a BSD and the 11/44 running 2.8 BSD is 300000 baud;
this was measured with INTERLAN 10 megabit ethernet hardware.
For programmers, there is easy access to all layers of protocol, so
that (e.g.) IP or UDP services can be written. Service protocols
available are all of those supplied with the VAX version: FTP, TELNET,
ECHO, rlogin, rsh, rexec, talk, routing daemons.
1. Hardware - currently requires an I/D machine, such as an 11/44
or 11/70 with at least a half megabyte of memory. The total kernel
size (text, data, and buffers) is about 200K bytes; so it won't
fit if you have only 256K bytes. Although this sounds like a lot
of bytes, comparison with our older 2.8 BSD NCP-only system shows
that the kernel has only grown by about 60K bytes. This is very
reasonable considering that the entire network is now resident
versus the NCP case which used a hulking NCP daemon.
A number of net interfaces are supported. See the Berkeley VAX
documentation. The ones specifically ported to the 11 are:
INTERLAN 10 megabit ethernet, ACC LH/DH, SRI 1822, DEC IMP11A.
Porting a new VAX interface driver to the 11 involves changing
less than 10 lines of code.
2. Software - ported from the 4.1a Berkeley VAX UNIX system.
Manipulates I and D space mapping registers to reference more than
65K bytes of instructions and data at a time.
3. Documentation - supplied on tape as manual pages.
Contact for further information: Dan Chernikoff, dan@sri-tsc, (415) 859
4144. We can mail a copy of our distribution tape. Eventually the
software will be incorporated in Berkeley's next PDP11 distribution
(2.82 BSD). This tape is supplied as-is to 2.8 BSD licenses, with no
warrantees or support expressed or implied. The terms of your original
Berkeley license apply: the software cannot be resold or redistributed.
To get the software, send a magnetic tape and a copy of your 2.8 or 4.x
license to:
Dan Chernikoff
SRI International
333 Ravenswood Ave.
Menlo Park, CA 94025
As far as updates and bug fixes go, this mailing list (ucbtcp11@sri-tsc)
can be used as a distribution point. Send a note to dan@sri-tsc to
add or delete names from the list.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1982 1703-CDT
From: grg at Dti (Gary Grossman)
Subject: TCP/IP for VAX/VMS
This is to clarify a misconception that might be fostered by the note
from Y. Pin Foo in TCP-IP Digest #1:23. Digital Technology Incorporated (DTI)
does indeed market software including TCP/IP under the name "ACCESS".
Our software is available for connection to the ARPANET via the ACC LH/DH-11.
It is also available in an Ethernet version using 3COM's Unibus Ethernet
interface.
The only 3COM software that we use is the device driver that is supplied
with the 3COM hardware. All other software, including IP, TCP, TELNET,
FTP, and MAIL, was produced at DTI.
The first copy of the software package costs $15K. Additional copies
to the same site cost $6K.
Gary Grossman
------------------------------
Date: 18 Oct 1982 13:10:48-EST
From: Chris Kent <cak@Purdue>
Via: Brl; 18 Oct 82 15:20-EDT
Am in the process of reading this "Xerox System Integration Standard",
and was wondering if anyone had thought about implementing this on top
of IP and/or TCP... and what progress you've made.
Cheers,
chris
------------------------------
Date: 7 Oct 1982 9:01:06 EDT (Thursday)
From: Andrew Malis <malis at BBN-UNIX>
Subject: TCP-only throughput figures
Mike,
Vint Cerf suggested that you may be interested in including the
following figures in some form in the TCP-IP digest. Basically,
they are a comparison of the number of packets going through the
net during the TCP-only test, as compared to the previous day
during the same time period. They show that during the test, the
network had about 47% of the number of packets flowing as it did
during the previous day at the same time.
You may want to include the figures as is, or you may want to
just present the totals. I'll leave that up to you.
Andy Malis
HOST THROUGHPUT SUMMARY, OCTOBER 1ST
Packets Received
Inter-node Intra-Node Total
>From Fri Oct 1 12:13:51 1982
To Fri Oct 1 13:02:44 1982
Net Totals: 338765 33679 372444
>From Fri Oct 1 13:02:46 1982
To Fri Oct 1 13:51:39 1982
Net Totals: 336164 82056 418220
>From Fri Oct 1 13:51:39 1982
To Fri Oct 1 14:40:32 1982
Net Totals: 446443 40376 486819
>From Fri Oct 1 14:40:34 1982
To Fri Oct 1 15:29:27 1982
Net Totals: 451627 66647 518274
>From Fri Oct 1 15:29:27 1982
To Fri Oct 1 16:00:00 1982
Net Totals: 399462 42043 441505
________________________________________
Net Totals: 1972461 264801 2237262
========================================================
HOST THROUGHPUT SUMMARY, SEPTEMBER 30TH
Packets Received
Inter-node Intra-Node Total
>From Thu Sep 30 12:17:18 1982
To Thu Sep 30 13:06:11 1982
Net Totals: 662445 74644 737089
>From Thu Sep 30 13:06:19 1982
To Thu Sep 30 13:55:12 1982
Net Totals: 671169 174553 845722
>From Thu Sep 30 13:55:14 1982
To Thu Sep 30 14:44:07 1982
Net Totals: 823234 156222 979456
>From Thu Sep 30 14:44:17 1982
To Thu Sep 30 15:33:10 1982
Net Totals: 905026 138187 1043213
>From Thu Sep 30 15:33:07 1982
To Thu Sep 30 16:00:00 1982
Net Totals: 987427 132308 1119735
________________________________________
Net Totals: 4049301 675914 4725215
------------------------------
Date: 26 Oct 1982 18:55:33 EDT (Tuesday)
From: Michael Brescia <brescia@Bbn-Unix>
To: Cain at Edn-Unix, mcneill at Bbn-Unix, control at Bbn-Unix
Subject: DCEC gateway up on satnet
Redistributed-by: Bob Hinden <hinden@Bbn-Unix>
Redistributed-to: gateway-info at BBN-UNIX
Redistributed-date: 27 Oct 1982 8:49:50 EDT (Wednesday)
Gateway 15 DCEC 10.1.0.20 (Arpanet) Tue Oct 26 18:47:25 1982
Version 1002
Interfaces:
UP: DCEC 4.0.0.24 (Satnet) !!!!!!!!
UP: DCEC 10.1.0.20 (Arpanet)
UP: DCEC 21.0.0.2 (EDN)
Neighbors:
UP: NTARE 4.0.0.38 (Satnet) !!!!!!
UP: UCL 4.0.0.60 (Satnet) !!!!
...
gstatus terminated at Tue Oct 26 18:47:26 1982
------
thanks to dale, peter, mike, mike, bill, cathy, &c, and WUI
The line from DCEC to ETAM has come up for real. DCEC gateway sees the
satnet, and also its satnet neighbors. That ought to create real fun for
the gateway routing.
We expect to watch this for a while to make sure it settles in for good.
Mike
------------------------------
Date: 29 Oct 1982 11:18:37 EDT (Friday)
From: Bob Hinden <hinden@Bbn-Unix>
Subject: Results of DCEC Gateway Test
To: gateway-info at Bbn-Unix
Yesterdays test, which consisted of looping away the VDH line of the
BBN gateway, was very successfull. All the traffic which normally
used the BBN gateway as a route between Satnet and the Arpanet was
redirected to the DCEC gateway. I have included throughput data for
the period before and during the test, showing that the traffic
load switched to the DCEC gateway after the VDH line was looped.
[ Here is the correct throughput data for the DCEC gateway test.
The first message included the data for the period before the
test twice. -Bob Hinden ]
Throughput Summary from 0300 to 0900 EST 28 Oct 82
GWY GWY RCVD RCVD IP % IP DEST % DST
NO. NAME DGRAMS BYTES ERRORS ERRORS UNRCH UNRCH
2 BBN 77,702 3,328,454 0 0.00% 8 0.01%
15 DCEC 54,625 2,342,132 0 0.00% 13 0.02%
TOTALS 132,327 5,670,586 0 0.00% 21 0.02%
GWY GWY SENT SENT DROPPED % DROPPED
NO. NAME DGRAMS BYTES DGRAMS DGRAMS
2 BBN 82,797 3,417,237 0 0.00%
15 DCEC 53,983 2,222,390 0 0.00%
TOTALS 136,780 5,639,627 0 0.00%
Throughput Summary 0900 to 1500 EST 28 Oct 82
GWY GWY RCVD RCVD IP % IP DEST % DST
NO. NAME DGRAMS BYTES ERRORS ERRORS UNRCH UNRCH
2 BBN 43,025 1,265,324 1 0.00% 19 0.04%
15 DCEC 101,881 4,979,852 1 0.00% 154 0.15%
TOTALS 144,906 6,245,176 2 0.00% 173 0.12%
GWY GWY SENT SENT DROPPED % DROPPED
NO. NAME DGRAMS BYTES DGRAMS DGRAMS
2 BBN 49,409 1,402,482 0 0.00%
15 DCEC 102,607 4,873,176 4 0.00%
TOTALS 152,016 6,275,658 4 0.00%
We are now seeing evidence that having two gateways between the
Arpanet and Satnet is improving the quality of service for the Satnet
users. This in conjuction with some TCP fixes made to the TAC
software should result in more reliable service.
Bob
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 82 15:46:52 CDT
From: estell at NWC-387B
Subject: VMS to UNIX software for DECNet
We are looking for a reliable and affordable software package that implements
a "DEC Net" interface between a UNIX host and a VMS host (both VAX computers).
The idea is that, if we must have UNIX as an ARPANET interface, we want to
be able to connect that host VAX to our other VAX computers, via DECNet.
Also, we have a VAX here at NWC that is running UNIX now; someday they may
want to join our NWCNet (LAN), via "DEC Net."
Do you know of such software?
If not, do you WANT to know about it? (i.e., If I go hunting, do you want
to be informed of my findings?)
Please reply to ESTELL at NWC-387B.
Thanks,
Bob
------------------------------
Date: 15 Oct 82 13:42:29-EDT (Fri)
From: Rick <rturner.xls-onyx02@Udel-Relay>
To: tcp-ip at BRL
cc: unix-wizards at Sri-Unix
Subject: TCP/IP &/or NCP for 3.0 UNIX
We are running UNIX 3.0 on an 11/70 and we're trying to get it running on the
net. We are currently using the CSNET as a gateway to Arpanet, but want
to get our system(s) directly into it.
We are looking at various places to get a reasonable NCP (short-term) and
TCP/IP (longer) that we can port over to 3.0. Is there anyone else out
there in UNIX-land who is trying to get to NCP and/or TCP/IP under these
circumstances?
rick
------------------------------
Date: 18 Oct 1982 23:28:47-EST
From: Chris Kent <cak@Purdue>
Reply-to: cak at Purdue
To: rturner.xls-onyx02 at Udel-Relay, tcp-ip at BRL
Subject: Re: TCP/IP &/or NCP for 3.0 UNIX
Seems like you could get the Greep NCP front end that runs on VAXen
to work. But I'm not sure it would be worth the effort for a little
over two months of access.
As for TCP, you might want to look at the work that Bill Croft has
just completed. Are you tied to a 3.0 kernel? If not, you can
just put his up (it's based on 2.8bsd). Otherwise, you have some
work to do, but his code should be a good guideline.
Cheers,
chris
------------------------------
END OF TCP-IP DIGEST
********************
-----------[000002][next][prev][last][first]---------------------------------------------------- Date: 16 Nov 1982 9:43:34 EST (Tuesday) From: Andrew Malis <malis at BBN-UNIX> To: cerf@usc-isi, dcacode252@usc-isi, gpark@bbnc, tcp-ip@sri-nic, gurwitz at BBN-UNIX, herman at BBN-UNIX, haverty at BBN-UNIX, postel@usc-isif, lynch@isib, kahn@usc-isi, DCLARK.INP@mit-multics, mills@usc-isie, feinler@sri-nic Cc: malis at BBN-UNIX Subject: TCP-only throughput, 11/15
The total ARPANET throughput for yesterday's TCP-only test was 9,466,256 packets. This is 62% of the total throughput for the previous Monday, 11/8, when 15,283,672 packets were passed by the net. Regards, Andy Malis for the NOC
-----------[000003][next][prev][last][first]---------------------------------------------------- Date: 18 Nov 1982 10:35:14 EST (Thursday) From: Andrew Malis <malis at BBN-UNIX> To: dhenry@bbnc, gpark@bbnc, heiden@bbnc, dcacodeb627@bbnb Cc: cerf@usc-isi, dcacode252@usc-isi, tcp-ip@sri-nic, postel@usc-isif, lynch@isib, kahn@usc-isi, DCLARK.INP%mit-multics@usc-isid, mills@usc-isid, feinler@sri-nic, herman at BBN-UNIX, haverty at BBN-UNIX, gurwitz at BBN-UNIX, malis at BBN-UNIX, miller@sri-nic Subject: Host-by-host breakdown, 11/15/82
The following is the host-by-host throughput breakdown for the
TCP test on the 15th. Note that the starting time for the data
is 00:48; since the IMPs weren't completely disabled for NCP
until 00:10 or so, the first recording interval for the data has
been discarded.
Hosts that were only running NCP (or were down for the period)
will have zeros in both columns. Unfortunately, it is not easy
to correlate this with information about which hosts were up or
down during the day, because the NOC logger only records host
state transistions, and hosts with no up/down transitions during
the day would not show up in the log. If information is needed
about a specific host, you can get back to me, and I can check
for any transitions between 00:00 on the 15th and now, and
compare this to its current state. However, this would take me a
while if I were to do it for every host in the net.
Also note that IMPs 33, 35, and 36 had NCP enabled during the
test, for the CINCPAC demo. By the time of the next test in
December, the PLIs should be fixed to not use link 0, and such
enabling will not be necessary.
If I can be of any further assistance, please let me know.
Regards,
Andy Malis
For the NOC
----------------------------------------------------------------
Host Throughput From Mon Nov 15 00:48:56 1982
To Tue Nov 16 00:00:03 1982
Host Name {node/ Packets Sent
host} Inter-Node Intra-Node
UCLA-ATS { 1/0} 0 0
UCLA-CCN { 1/1} 522 1587
UCLA-SECURITY { 1/2} 0 0
UCLA-LOCUS { 1/3} 648 0
SRI-NSC11 { 2/0} 0 0
SRI-KL { 2/1} 0 0
SRI-CSL { 2/2} 0 0
SRI-TSC { 2/3} 0 0
NOSC-CC { 3/0} 0 0
NOSC-SPEL { 3/1} 0 0
LOGICON { 3/2} 0 0
NPRDC { 3/3} 0 0
UTAH-CS { 4/0} 0 0
UTAH-TAC { 4/2} 470 0
UTAH-20 { 4/3} 0 0
BBNF { 5/0} 8698 31577
BBNG { 5/1} 55864 12195
BBN-PTIP { 5/2} 49579 68004
BBNA { 5/3} 5504 13730
MIT-MULTICS { 6/0} 32083 0
MIT-DMS { 6/1} 0 0
MIT-AI { 6/2} 0 0
MIT-ML { 6/3} 0 0
RAND-AI { 7/0} 0 0
RAND-RELAY { 7/1} 0 0
RAND-TAC { 7/2} 5174 0
RAND-UNIX { 7/3} 0 0
NRL0 { 8/0} 0 0
NSWC-WO { 8/2} 0 0
NRL-TOPS10 { 8/3} 0 0
NRL-ARCTAN { 8/6} 0 0
NRL-CSS { 8/7} 0 0
HARV-10 { 9/0} 0 0
YALE { 9/2} 0 0
LL {10/0} 0 0
LL-TCP {10/1} 107 0
LL-XN {10/2} 0 0
LL-11 {10/3} 1717 0
SU-AI {11/0} 0 0
STAN-TAC {11/2} 63961 16
SU-SCORE {11/3} 0 0
DTI-VMS {12/0} 2810 199
DTI0 {12/1} 0 0
GUNTER-UNIX {13/0} 0 0
GUNTER-ADM {13/1} 32378 231372
GUNTER-TAC {13/2} 5862 207057
CMU-10B {14/0} 0 0
CMU-10A {14/1} 19 6049
CMU-GATEWAY {14/2} 7078 1362
CMU-20C {14/3} 0 0
AMES-67 {16/0} 0 0
AMES-TIP {16/2} 0 0
AMES-11 {16/3} 0 0
MITRE0 {17/0} 0 0
MITRE-GATEWAY {17/1} 0 1558012
MITRE-TAC {17/2} 140271 125
COMSAT-MTR {17/3} 97678 4568
RADC-MULTICS {18/0} 2833 1132
RADC-XPER {18/1} 0 0
RADC-TAC {18/2} 50250 1662
RADC-TOPS20 {18/3} 0 0
ROCHESTER {18/4} 0 0
RADC-UNIX {18/5} 0 0
RADC-XMULTICS {18/6} 0 0
NBS-VMS {19/0} 0 0
NBS-SDC {19/1} 0 0
NBS-PL {19/3} 0 10
CCTC {20/0} 0 0
DCEC-GATEWAY {20/1} 93684 8915
DCEC-TAC {20/2} 91842 1907
EDN-UNIX {20/3} 11148 5692
LLL-UNIX {21/0} 0 0
LLL-MFE {21/1} 0 0
ISI-SPEECH11 {22/0} 50 0
USC-ISI {22/1} 414792 0
USC-ISIC {22/2} 0 0
ISI-PSAT {22/3} 8178 0
USC-ECLB {23/0} 382543 1899
USC-ECLC {23/1} 103443 879
USC-TAC {23/2} 10242 138
USC-ECL {23/3} 147923 131
NADC {24/2} 0 0
WHARTON-10 {24/3} 0 0
SEISMO {25/0} 9891 3200
PENTAGON-TIP {26/2} 0 0
USC-ISID {27/0} 674435 2273
ISI-PNG11 {27/1} 22960 2121
ISI-VAXA {27/2} 145453 123
RAND-RELAY {27/3} 0 0
ARPA-DMS {28/0} 0 0
ARPA1-TAC {28/1} 31555 17
ARPA2-TAC {28/2} 113513 20
ARPA-PENGUIN {28/3} 3181 0
BRL {29/0} 0 0
ABER-TAC {29/2} 3359 94
BRL-BMD {29/3} 294 3
BROOKS-TAC {30/0} 467 0
CCA-UNIX {31/0} 0 0
CCA-VMS {31/1} 95 0
CCA-TAC {31/2} 465 0
MIT-DEVMULTICS {31/3} 153 0
PARC-MAXC {32/0} 0 0
KESTREL {32/3} 11 0
NPS0 {33/0} 4777 99
FNOC {33/1} 0 0
NPS-TAC {33/2} 27393 0
FNOC-SECURE {33/3} 13284 103
LBL0 {34/0} 0 0
LBL-UNIX {34/1} 15283 4467
NOSC-SECURE2 {35/0} 116068 19
NOSC-SDL {35/1} 428 3322
ACCAT-TAC {35/2} 215438 3
NOSC-SECURE3 {35/3} 4151 19
COINS-TAS {36/0} 24 1019
CINCPACFLT-WM {36/1} 59237 465
ALOHA-TAC {36/2} 19133 0
PURDUE {37/0} 0 0
CSNET-PURDUE {37/2} 13660 0
BRAGG-GWY1 {38/0} 97935 5593
BRAGG-STA1 {38/1} 0 0
BRAGG-TAC {38/2} 263600 0
NCC-TAC {40/0} 135210 9858
PSAT-GATEWAY {40/1} 0 0
HP-3000 {40/2} 0 0
SATNET-GATEWAY {40/3} 204826 11934
REDST-TAC {41/2} 0 0
OFFICE-1 {43/0} 0 0
OFFICE-2 {43/1} 0 0
OFFICE-3 {43/2} 6 0
OFFICE-7 {43/3} 2831 0
MIT-XX {44/0} 162779 0
LL-ASG {44/1} 0 0
MIT-TSTGW {44/2} 0 0
MIT-MC {44/3} 0 0
COLLINS-PR {46/0} 0 0
COLLNS-TAC {46/2} 12519 0
OKC-UNIX {46/3} 1848 0
WPAFB0 {47/0} 0 0
WPAFB-AFWAL {47/1} 0 0
WPAFB-TIP {47/2} 0 0
AFWL0 {48/0} 0 0
AFWL-TIP {48/2} 0 0
BBNB {49/0} 87318 0
CRONUS-GATEW {49/1} 27909 5535
BBNC {49/3} 97118 0
DARCOM-TAC {50/2} 40687 0
SRI-C3PO {51/1} 72141 17734
SRI-UNIX {51/2} 0 0
SRI-R2D2 {51/3} 86299 14832
ISI-VAXB {52/0} 0 0
USC-ISIE {52/1} 279258 17223
USC-ISIF {52/2} 89846 37614
USC-ISIB {52/3} 66886 38943
AFSC-AD {53/0} 16193 875
NCSC {53/1} 0 0
AFSC-DEV {53/2} 1 979
MARTIN {53/3} 0 0
CIT-20 {54/0} 9424 18957
CIT-VAX {54/1} 941 26514
ACC {54/2} 0 0
JPL-VAX {54/3} 258 160
ANL0 {55/0} 0 0
ANL-MCS {55/1} 0 0
SUMEX-AIM {56/0} 0 0
SU-DSN {56/1} 0 0
TYCHO {57/0} 0 0
COINS-GATEWAY {57/1} 0 0
NYU0 {58/0} 0 0
BNL {58/1} 0 0
RUTGERS {58/2} 0 0
NUSC-NL {58/3} 0 0
ETAC {59/0} 0 0
CENTACS-MMP {60/0} 0 0
CORADCOM-TIP {60/2} 0 0
CENTACS-TF {60/3} 0 0
STLA-TAC {61/2} 44088 0
UTEXAS-11 {62/0} 0 0
UTEXAS-20 {62/1} 0 0
BBN-RSM {63/0} 4162 0
BBN-TAC {63/1} 14272 18
11/40-TESTGATE {63/3} 0 0
TIU-TEST-GATE {63/5} 0 0
VAN-TEST-GATE {63/6} 0 0
MARTIN-B {64/1} 0 0
ROBINS-TAC {64/2} 711 0
ROBINS-UNIX {64/3} 0 0
AFSC-SD {65/0} 0 0
AFSD-TAC {65/1} 29836 1143
AEROSPACE {65/2} 2534 894
MITRE-BEDFORD {66/0} 0 0
AFGL1 {66/1} 0 0
AFGL-TAC {66/2} 16212 10
AFSC-HQ {67/0} 0 0
ANDRWS-TAC {67/1} 1072 41
USGS1-MULTICS {68/0} 0 0
USGS1-AMDAHL {68/2} 0 0
USGS1-TAC {68/3} 356 0
USGS2-MULTICS {69/0} 0 0
USGS2-TAC {69/1} 12911 0
USAFA-GW {69/2} 0 0
USGS3-MULTICS {70/0} 0 0
USGS3-TAC {70/1} 468 2
CLARK-IG {71/1} 7251 0
BBN-CLXX {71/2} 66404 0
BBN-NOC {72/0} 21178 394
BBN-UNIX {72/1} 0 0
BBNP {72/2} 97348 146938
RCCGW {72/3} 298733 134756
SRI-NIC {73/0} 46241 1406
SRI-WARF {73/1} 7296 150
SRI-AI {73/2} 0 0
SRI-IU {73/3} 70 43
WSMR-TAC {74/2} 953 0
YUMA-TAC {75/2} 463 0
MIT-GW {77/0} 82354 3236
MIT-TAC {77/2} 73190 1924
UCB-ARPA {78/0} 4472 0
UCB-C70 {78/1} 0 0
UCB-INGVAX {78/2} 0 0
MCCLELLAN {78/3} 871 0
DEC-2136 {79/0} 0 0
DEC-MARLBORO {79/1} 0 0
HI-MULTICS {80/0} 278 24
SAC-TAC2 {80/1} 0 0
SAC-TAC {80/2} 165960 0
SAC-GW {80/3} 0 0
NALCON {81/0} 0 0
DTNSRDC {81/1} 0 0
DAVID-TAC {81/2} 10288 110
NEMS {81/3} 0 0
BBNT {82/0} 0 0
BBN-VAX {82/1} 48074 211
BBN-INOC {82/2} 9125 0
BBNS {82/3} 203973 2972
BBN-NOC2 {82/6} 2029 2590
NSWC-DL {84/0} 0 0
NSWC-TAC {84/2} 3072 3
NWC-387A {85/0} 0 0
NWC-ELF {85/1} 0 0
CHINA-TAC {85/2} 340 0
NWC-387B {85/3} 0 0
SANDIA0 {87/0} 0 0
NLM-MCS {88/0} 0 0
WASHINGTON0 {91/0} 0 0
WASH-TAC {91/2} 1713 23
UW-VLSI {91/3} 1990 34
NUSC-NPT {92/2} 0 0
OFFICE-8 {93/0} 0 0
OFFICE-10 {93/1} 0 0
UWISC0 {94/0} 0 0
CSNET-SH {94/1} 0 0
S1-GATEWAY {95/0} 3 0
S1-A {95/1} 0 0
S1-B {95/2} 0 0
S1-C {95/3} 0 0
UDEL-RELAY {96/0} 0 0
UDEL-TCP {96/1} 5577 174
UDEL-EE {96/2} 8763 173
PAXRV-TAC {97/3} 466 0
-----------[000004][next][prev][last][first]---------------------------------------------------- Date: 25 Nov 82 From: TCP-IP at BRL To: TCP-IP at BRL Subject: TCP-IP Digest, Vol 1 #25
TCP/IP Digest Thursday, 25 Nov 1982 Volume 1 : Issue 25
Today's Topics:
Needed: 3COM drivers for LD/DH-11
Finger and Echo servers done for BBN VAX UNIX
Request for information about TCP implementations
SRI-NIC has Digest Archives for FTP
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
For Research Use Only --- Not for Public Distribution
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Mike Muuss <TCP-IP@BRL>
Subject: Decrease in submissions
Due to a serious decrease in submissions, this issue and subsequent
issues will be sent out as soon as possible, rather than waiting for
a while to "batch" together messages. I suppose everybody is too busy
setting up their TCP code to send messages....
Good Luck....TCP only day is near!
-Mike
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1982 1411-EST
From: Graham Campbell <gc@Bnl>
To: Unix-wizards at Sri-Csl, TCP-IP at BRL
Subject: 3COM TCP/IP drivers
Does anyone have the system interface code and drivers for Unix v7 to
fit between 3COM TCP/IP and an LH/DH 11? Obviously we need it before
Jan 1.
------------------------------
Date: 31 Oct 1982 15:15:35-EST
From: Christopher A. Kent <cak@Purdue>
To: tcp-ip@brl
Subject: Finger and echo servers for BBN VAX TCP/IP
Just wanted to post a short note to let folks running the BBN TCP/IP
for the VAX that we've written finger and echo servers, and that
anyone who wants a copy is welcome to them.
Cheers,
chris
------------------------------
Date: 24 Nov 1982 1718-EST
From: Seshashayee Murthy <Murthy@Cmu-Cs-C>
Subject: Re: TCP-IP Digest, Vol 1 #24
To: TCP-IP at BRL
I would like to find out the following information about TCP implementations.
- How many different implementations of TCP exist.
- In which language have they been implemented. Approximately how many
lines of code are there in the implementation.
- On which computers have they been implemented.
- How much memory and processing power do they require.
If you send the replies directly to me I will post my findings back on the
list. Thanks in advance Sesh
------------------------------
From: Mike Muuss <Mike@BRL>
Subject: TCP-IP Digest Archive
I have been informed by the NIC that they now have a directory
[SRI-NIC] <TCP-DIGEST>
where they have complete archives of the digest to date.
The NIC is host 10.0.0.73 and supports anonymous NCP FTP.
------------------------------
END OF TCP-IP DIGEST
********************
-----------[000005][next][prev][last][first]---------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat Nov 27 03:02:19 1982 From: TCP-IP@BRL To: fa.tcp-ip Subject: TCP-IP Digest, Vol 1 #25
TCP/IP Digest Thursday, 25 Nov 1982 Volume 1 : Issue 25
Today's Topics:
Needed: 3COM drivers for LD/DH-11
Finger and Echo servers done for BBN VAX UNIX
Request for information about TCP implementations
SRI-NIC has Digest Archives for FTP
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
For Research Use Only --- Not for Public Distribution
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Mike Muuss <TCP-IP@BRL>
Subject: Decrease in submissions
Due to a serious decrease in submissions, this issue and subsequent
issues will be sent out as soon as possible, rather than waiting for
a while to "batch" together messages. I suppose everybody is too busy
setting up their TCP code to send messages....
Good Luck....TCP only day is near!
-Mike
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1982 1411-EST
From: Graham Campbell <gc@Bnl>
To: Unix-wizards at Sri-Csl, TCP-IP at BRL
Subject: 3COM TCP/IP drivers
Does anyone have the system interface code and drivers for Unix v7 to
fit between 3COM TCP/IP and an LH/DH 11? Obviously we need it before
Jan 1.
------------------------------
Date: 31 Oct 1982 15:15:35-EST
From: Christopher A. Kent <cak@Purdue>
To: tcp-ip@brl
Subject: Finger and echo servers for BBN VAX TCP/IP
Just wanted to post a short note to let folks running the BBN TCP/IP
for the VAX that we've written finger and echo servers, and that
anyone who wants a copy is welcome to them.
Cheers,
chris
------------------------------
Date: 24 Nov 1982 1718-EST
From: Seshashayee Murthy <Murthy@Cmu-Cs-C>
Subject: Re: TCP-IP Digest, Vol 1 #24
To: TCP-IP at BRL
I would like to find out the following information about TCP implementations.
- How many different implementations of TCP exist.
- In which language have they been implemented. Approximately how many
lines of code are there in the implementation.
- On which computers have they been implemented.
- How much memory and processing power do they require.
If you send the replies directly to me I will post my findings back on the
list. Thanks in advance Sesh
------------------------------
From: Mike Muuss <Mike@BRL>
Subject: TCP-IP Digest Archive
I have been informed by the NIC that they now have a directory
[SRI-NIC] <TCP-DIGEST>
where they have complete archives of the digest to date.
The NIC is host 10.0.0.73 and supports anonymous NCP FTP.
------------------------------
END OF TCP-IP DIGEST
********************
-----------[000006][next][prev][last][first]---------------------------------------------------- Date: 29 Nov 1982 From: TCP-IP at BRL To: TCP-IP at BRL Subject: TCP-IP Digest, Vol 1 #26
TCP/IP Digest Monday, 29 Nov 1982 Volume 1 : Issue 26
Today's Topics:
Request for TCP-IP above X.25 implementation?
Implementation Information Source
Host Throughput Results for 15-Nov TCP Only Tests
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
For Research Use Only --- Not for Public Distribution
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 29 Nov 1982 0651-EST
From: Marc Shapiro <Shapiro@Mit-Xx>
Subject: X25 / Request for information
To: tcp-ip at BRL
Are there any usable implemetations of either TCP-IP or just TCP above
X.25 for the following systems:
DEC-20 (Tops-20)
Vax (unix)
Multics
Reply to shapiro@mit-xx
PS. I am not on the Tcp-IP list.
[ Such an implementation has been done by the CSNET folks for VAX UNIX.
Try Chris Kent <CAK @ Purdue>. -Mike ]
------------------------------
Date: 26 Nov 1982 1155-PST
From: POSTEL at Usc-Isif
Subject: Information about Implementations
To: Murthy at Cmu-Cs-C
cc: TCp-IP at BRL
Sesh:
The Network Information Center keeps a file of such information. It
is <NETINFO>TCP-IP-STATUS.TXT on the SRI-NIC host. Please copy it
via FTP.
--jon.
------------------------------
Date: 25 Nov 1982 9:25:11 EST (Thursday)
From: Andrew Malis <malis@Bbn-Unix>
Subject: Host throughput results for 11/15/82 TCP-only test
To: tcp-ip at BRL
As you all must know, the ARPANET had a 24-hour TCP only test on
11/15. On that day, The total ARPANET throughput was 9,466,256
packets. This is 62% of the total throughput for the previous
Monday, 11/8, when 15,283,672 packets were passed by the net.
The following data presents the host-by-host throughput breakdown
for the 15th. Note that the starting time for the data is 00:48
EST; since the IMPs weren't completely disabled for NCP until
00:10 or so, the first recording interval for the data has been
discarded.
Hosts that were only running NCP (or were down for the period)
will have zeros in both columns. Also note that IMPs 33, 35, and
36 had NCP enabled during the test, for a Navy exercise.
Regards,
Andy Malis
For the NOC
----------------------------------------------------------------
Host Throughput From Mon Nov 15 00:48:56 1982
To Tue Nov 16 00:00:03 1982
Host Name {node/ Packets Sent
host} Inter-Node Intra-Node
UCLA-ATS { 1/0} 0 0
UCLA-CCN { 1/1} 522 1587
UCLA-SECURITY { 1/2} 0 0
UCLA-LOCUS { 1/3} 648 0
SRI-NSC11 { 2/0} 0 0
SRI-KL { 2/1} 0 0
SRI-CSL { 2/2} 0 0
SRI-TSC { 2/3} 0 0
NOSC-CC { 3/0} 0 0
NOSC-SPEL { 3/1} 0 0
LOGICON { 3/2} 0 0
NPRDC { 3/3} 0 0
UTAH-CS { 4/0} 0 0
UTAH-TAC { 4/2} 470 0
UTAH-20 { 4/3} 0 0
BBNF { 5/0} 8698 31577
BBNG { 5/1} 55864 12195
BBN-PTIP { 5/2} 49579 68004
BBNA { 5/3} 5504 13730
MIT-MULTICS { 6/0} 32083 0
MIT-DMS { 6/1} 0 0
MIT-AI { 6/2} 0 0
MIT-ML { 6/3} 0 0
RAND-AI { 7/0} 0 0
RAND-RELAY { 7/1} 0 0
RAND-TAC { 7/2} 5174 0
RAND-UNIX { 7/3} 0 0
NRL0 { 8/0} 0 0
NSWC-WO { 8/2} 0 0
NRL-TOPS10 { 8/3} 0 0
NRL-ARCTAN { 8/6} 0 0
NRL-CSS { 8/7} 0 0
HARV-10 { 9/0} 0 0
YALE { 9/2} 0 0
LL {10/0} 0 0
LL-TCP {10/1} 107 0
LL-XN {10/2} 0 0
LL-11 {10/3} 1717 0
SU-AI {11/0} 0 0
STAN-TAC {11/2} 63961 16
SU-SCORE {11/3} 0 0
DTI-VMS {12/0} 2810 199
DTI0 {12/1} 0 0
GUNTER-UNIX {13/0} 0 0
GUNTER-ADM {13/1} 32378 231372
GUNTER-TAC {13/2} 5862 207057
CMU-10B {14/0} 0 0
CMU-10A {14/1} 19 6049
CMU-GATEWAY {14/2} 7078 1362
CMU-20C {14/3} 0 0
AMES-67 {16/0} 0 0
AMES-TIP {16/2} 0 0
AMES-11 {16/3} 0 0
MITRE0 {17/0} 0 0
MITRE-GATEWAY {17/1} 0 1558012
MITRE-TAC {17/2} 140271 125
COMSAT-MTR {17/3} 97678 4568
RADC-MULTICS {18/0} 2833 1132
RADC-XPER {18/1} 0 0
RADC-TAC {18/2} 50250 1662
RADC-TOPS20 {18/3} 0 0
ROCHESTER {18/4} 0 0
RADC-UNIX {18/5} 0 0
RADC-XMULTICS {18/6} 0 0
NBS-VMS {19/0} 0 0
NBS-SDC {19/1} 0 0
NBS-PL {19/3} 0 10
CCTC {20/0} 0 0
DCEC-GATEWAY {20/1} 93684 8915
DCEC-TAC {20/2} 91842 1907
EDN-UNIX {20/3} 11148 5692
LLL-UNIX {21/0} 0 0
LLL-MFE {21/1} 0 0
ISI-SPEECH11 {22/0} 50 0
USC-ISI {22/1} 414792 0
USC-ISIC {22/2} 0 0
ISI-PSAT {22/3} 8178 0
USC-ECLB {23/0} 382543 1899
USC-ECLC {23/1} 103443 879
USC-TAC {23/2} 10242 138
USC-ECL {23/3} 147923 131
NADC {24/2} 0 0
WHARTON-10 {24/3} 0 0
SEISMO {25/0} 9891 3200
PENTAGON-TIP {26/2} 0 0
USC-ISID {27/0} 674435 2273
ISI-PNG11 {27/1} 22960 2121
ISI-VAXA {27/2} 145453 123
RAND-RELAY {27/3} 0 0
ARPA-DMS {28/0} 0 0
ARPA1-TAC {28/1} 31555 17
ARPA2-TAC {28/2} 113513 20
ARPA-PENGUIN {28/3} 3181 0
BRL {29/0} 0 0
ABER-TAC {29/2} 3359 94
BRL-BMD {29/3} 294 3
BROOKS-TAC {30/0} 467 0
CCA-UNIX {31/0} 0 0
CCA-VMS {31/1} 95 0
CCA-TAC {31/2} 465 0
MIT-DEVMULTICS {31/3} 153 0
PARC-MAXC {32/0} 0 0
KESTREL {32/3} 11 0
NPS0 {33/0} 4777 99
FNOC {33/1} 0 0
NPS-TAC {33/2} 27393 0
FNOC-SECURE {33/3} 13284 103
LBL0 {34/0} 0 0
LBL-UNIX {34/1} 15283 4467
NOSC-SECURE2 {35/0} 116068 19
NOSC-SDL {35/1} 428 3322
ACCAT-TAC {35/2} 215438 3
NOSC-SECURE3 {35/3} 4151 19
COINS-TAS {36/0} 24 1019
CINCPACFLT-WM {36/1} 59237 465
ALOHA-TAC {36/2} 19133 0
PURDUE {37/0} 0 0
CSNET-PURDUE {37/2} 13660 0
BRAGG-GWY1 {38/0} 97935 5593
BRAGG-STA1 {38/1} 0 0
BRAGG-TAC {38/2} 263600 0
NCC-TAC {40/0} 135210 9858
PSAT-GATEWAY {40/1} 0 0
HP-3000 {40/2} 0 0
SATNET-GATEWAY {40/3} 204826 11934
REDST-TAC {41/2} 0 0
OFFICE-1 {43/0} 0 0
OFFICE-2 {43/1} 0 0
OFFICE-3 {43/2} 6 0
OFFICE-7 {43/3} 2831 0
MIT-XX {44/0} 162779 0
LL-ASG {44/1} 0 0
MIT-TSTGW {44/2} 0 0
MIT-MC {44/3} 0 0
COLLINS-PR {46/0} 0 0
COLLNS-TAC {46/2} 12519 0
OKC-UNIX {46/3} 1848 0
WPAFB0 {47/0} 0 0
WPAFB-AFWAL {47/1} 0 0
WPAFB-TIP {47/2} 0 0
AFWL0 {48/0} 0 0
AFWL-TIP {48/2} 0 0
BBNB {49/0} 87318 0
CRONUS-GATEW {49/1} 27909 5535
BBNC {49/3} 97118 0
DARCOM-TAC {50/2} 40687 0
SRI-C3PO {51/1} 72141 17734
SRI-UNIX {51/2} 0 0
SRI-R2D2 {51/3} 86299 14832
ISI-VAXB {52/0} 0 0
USC-ISIE {52/1} 279258 17223
USC-ISIF {52/2} 89846 37614
USC-ISIB {52/3} 66886 38943
AFSC-AD {53/0} 16193 875
NCSC {53/1} 0 0
AFSC-DEV {53/2} 1 979
MARTIN {53/3} 0 0
CIT-20 {54/0} 9424 18957
CIT-VAX {54/1} 941 26514
ACC {54/2} 0 0
JPL-VAX {54/3} 258 160
ANL0 {55/0} 0 0
ANL-MCS {55/1} 0 0
SUMEX-AIM {56/0} 0 0
SU-DSN {56/1} 0 0
TYCHO {57/0} 0 0
COINS-GATEWAY {57/1} 0 0
NYU0 {58/0} 0 0
BNL {58/1} 0 0
RUTGERS {58/2} 0 0
NUSC-NL {58/3} 0 0
ETAC {59/0} 0 0
CENTACS-MMP {60/0} 0 0
CORADCOM-TIP {60/2} 0 0
CENTACS-TF {60/3} 0 0
STLA-TAC {61/2} 44088 0
UTEXAS-11 {62/0} 0 0
UTEXAS-20 {62/1} 0 0
BBN-RSM {63/0} 4162 0
BBN-TAC {63/1} 14272 18
11/40-TESTGATE {63/3} 0 0
TIU-TEST-GATE {63/5} 0 0
VAN-TEST-GATE {63/6} 0 0
MARTIN-B {64/1} 0 0
ROBINS-TAC {64/2} 711 0
ROBINS-UNIX {64/3} 0 0
AFSC-SD {65/0} 0 0
AFSD-TAC {65/1} 29836 1143
AEROSPACE {65/2} 2534 894
MITRE-BEDFORD {66/0} 0 0
AFGL1 {66/1} 0 0
AFGL-TAC {66/2} 16212 10
AFSC-HQ {67/0} 0 0
ANDRWS-TAC {67/1} 1072 41
USGS1-MULTICS {68/0} 0 0
USGS1-AMDAHL {68/2} 0 0
USGS1-TAC {68/3} 356 0
USGS2-MULTICS {69/0} 0 0
USGS2-TAC {69/1} 12911 0
USAFA-GW {69/2} 0 0
USGS3-MULTICS {70/0} 0 0
USGS3-TAC {70/1} 468 2
CLARK-IG {71/1} 7251 0
BBN-CLXX {71/2} 66404 0
BBN-NOC {72/0} 21178 394
BBN-UNIX {72/1} 0 0
BBNP {72/2} 97348 146938
RCCGW {72/3} 298733 134756
SRI-NIC {73/0} 46241 1406
SRI-WARF {73/1} 7296 150
SRI-AI {73/2} 0 0
SRI-IU {73/3} 70 43
WSMR-TAC {74/2} 953 0
YUMA-TAC {75/2} 463 0
MIT-GW {77/0} 82354 3236
MIT-TAC {77/2} 73190 1924
UCB-ARPA {78/0} 4472 0
UCB-C70 {78/1} 0 0
UCB-INGVAX {78/2} 0 0
MCCLELLAN {78/3} 871 0
DEC-2136 {79/0} 0 0
DEC-MARLBORO {79/1} 0 0
HI-MULTICS {80/0} 278 24
SAC-TAC2 {80/1} 0 0
SAC-TAC {80/2} 165960 0
SAC-GW {80/3} 0 0
NALCON {81/0} 0 0
DTNSRDC {81/1} 0 0
DAVID-TAC {81/2} 10288 110
NEMS {81/3} 0 0
BBNT {82/0} 0 0
BBN-VAX {82/1} 48074 211
BBN-INOC {82/2} 9125 0
BBNS {82/3} 203973 2972
BBN-NOC2 {82/6} 2029 2590
NSWC-DL {84/0} 0 0
NSWC-TAC {84/2} 3072 3
NWC-387A {85/0} 0 0
NWC-ELF {85/1} 0 0
CHINA-TAC {85/2} 340 0
NWC-387B {85/3} 0 0
SANDIA0 {87/0} 0 0
NLM-MCS {88/0} 0 0
WASHINGTON0 {91/0} 0 0
WASH-TAC {91/2} 1713 23
UW-VLSI {91/3} 1990 34
NUSC-NPT {92/2} 0 0
OFFICE-8 {93/0} 0 0
OFFICE-10 {93/1} 0 0
UWISC0 {94/0} 0 0
CSNET-SH {94/1} 0 0
S1-GATEWAY {95/0} 3 0
S1-A {95/1} 0 0
S1-B {95/2} 0 0
S1-C {95/3} 0 0
UDEL-RELAY {96/0} 0 0
UDEL-TCP {96/1} 5577 174
UDEL-EE {96/2} 8763 173
PAXRV-TAC {97/3} 466 0
------------------------------
END OF TCP-IP DIGEST
********************
-----------[000007][next][prev][last][first]---------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue Nov 30 04:16:54 1982 From: TCP-IP@BRL To: fa.tcp-ip Subject: TCP-IP Digest, Vol 1 #26
TCP/IP Digest Monday, 29 Nov 1982 Volume 1 : Issue 26
Today's Topics:
Request for TCP-IP above X.25 implementation?
Implementation Information Source
Host Throughput Results for 15-Nov TCP Only Tests
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
For Research Use Only --- Not for Public Distribution
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 29 Nov 1982 0651-EST
From: Marc Shapiro <Shapiro@Mit-Xx>
Subject: X25 / Request for information
To: tcp-ip at BRL
Are there any usable implemetations of either TCP-IP or just TCP above
X.25 for the following systems:
DEC-20 (Tops-20)
Vax (unix)
Multics
Reply to shapiro@mit-xx
PS. I am not on the Tcp-IP list.
[ Such an implementation has been done by the CSNET folks for VAX UNIX.
Try Chris Kent <CAK @ Purdue>. -Mike ]
------------------------------
Date: 26 Nov 1982 1155-PST
From: POSTEL at Usc-Isif
Subject: Information about Implementations
To: Murthy at Cmu-Cs-C
cc: TCp-IP at BRL
Sesh:
The Network Information Center keeps a file of such information. It
is <NETINFO>TCP-IP-STATUS.TXT on the SRI-NIC host. Please copy it
via FTP.
--jon.
------------------------------
Date: 25 Nov 1982 9:25:11 EST (Thursday)
From: Andrew Malis <malis@Bbn-Unix>
Subject: Host throughput results for 11/15/82 TCP-only test
To: tcp-ip at BRL
As you all must know, the ARPANET had a 24-hour TCP only test on
11/15. On that day, The total ARPANET throughput was 9,466,256
packets. This is 62% of the total throughput for the previous
Monday, 11/8, when 15,283,672 packets were passed by the net.
The following data presents the host-by-host throughput breakdown
for the 15th. Note that the starting time for the data is 00:48
EST; since the IMPs weren't completely disabled for NCP until
00:10 or so, the first recording interval for the data has been
discarded.
Hosts that were only running NCP (or were down for the period)
will have zeros in both columns. Also note that IMPs 33, 35, and
36 had NCP enabled during the test, for a Navy exercise.
Regards,
Andy Malis
For the NOC
----------------------------------------------------------------
Host Throughput From Mon Nov 15 00:48:56 1982
To Tue Nov 16 00:00:03 1982
Host Name {node/ Packets Sent
host} Inter-Node Intra-Node
UCLA-ATS { 1/0} 0 0
UCLA-CCN { 1/1} 522 1587
UCLA-SECURITY { 1/2} 0 0
UCLA-LOCUS { 1/3} 648 0
SRI-NSC11 { 2/0} 0 0
SRI-KL { 2/1} 0 0
SRI-CSL { 2/2} 0 0
SRI-TSC { 2/3} 0 0
NOSC-CC { 3/0} 0 0
NOSC-SPEL { 3/1} 0 0
LOGICON { 3/2} 0 0
NPRDC { 3/3} 0 0
UTAH-CS { 4/0} 0 0
UTAH-TAC { 4/2} 470 0
UTAH-20 { 4/3} 0 0
BBNF { 5/0} 8698 31577
BBNG { 5/1} 55864 12195
BBN-PTIP { 5/2} 49579 68004
BBNA { 5/3} 5504 13730
MIT-MULTICS { 6/0} 32083 0
MIT-DMS { 6/1} 0 0
MIT-AI { 6/2} 0 0
MIT-ML { 6/3} 0 0
RAND-AI { 7/0} 0 0
RAND-RELAY { 7/1} 0 0
RAND-TAC { 7/2} 5174 0
RAND-UNIX { 7/3} 0 0
NRL0 { 8/0} 0 0
NSWC-WO { 8/2} 0 0
NRL-TOPS10 { 8/3} 0 0
NRL-ARCTAN { 8/6} 0 0
NRL-CSS { 8/7} 0 0
HARV-10 { 9/0} 0 0
YALE { 9/2} 0 0
LL {10/0} 0 0
LL-TCP {10/1} 107 0
LL-XN {10/2} 0 0
LL-11 {10/3} 1717 0
SU-AI {11/0} 0 0
STAN-TAC {11/2} 63961 16
SU-SCORE {11/3} 0 0
DTI-VMS {12/0} 2810 199
DTI0 {12/1} 0 0
GUNTER-UNIX {13/0} 0 0
GUNTER-ADM {13/1} 32378 231372
GUNTER-TAC {13/2} 5862 207057
CMU-10B {14/0} 0 0
CMU-10A {14/1} 19 6049
CMU-GATEWAY {14/2} 7078 1362
CMU-20C {14/3} 0 0
AMES-67 {16/0} 0 0
AMES-TIP {16/2} 0 0
AMES-11 {16/3} 0 0
MITRE0 {17/0} 0 0
MITRE-GATEWAY {17/1} 0 1558012
MITRE-TAC {17/2} 140271 125
COMSAT-MTR {17/3} 97678 4568
RADC-MULTICS {18/0} 2833 1132
RADC-XPER {18/1} 0 0
RADC-TAC {18/2} 50250 1662
RADC-TOPS20 {18/3} 0 0
ROCHESTER {18/4} 0 0
RADC-UNIX {18/5} 0 0
RADC-XMULTICS {18/6} 0 0
NBS-VMS {19/0} 0 0
NBS-SDC {19/1} 0 0
NBS-PL {19/3} 0 10
CCTC {20/0} 0 0
DCEC-GATEWAY {20/1} 93684 8915
DCEC-TAC {20/2} 91842 1907
EDN-UNIX {20/3} 11148 5692
LLL-UNIX {21/0} 0 0
LLL-MFE {21/1} 0 0
ISI-SPEECH11 {22/0} 50 0
USC-ISI {22/1} 414792 0
USC-ISIC {22/2} 0 0
ISI-PSAT {22/3} 8178 0
USC-ECLB {23/0} 382543 1899
USC-ECLC {23/1} 103443 879
USC-TAC {23/2} 10242 138
USC-ECL {23/3} 147923 131
NADC {24/2} 0 0
WHARTON-10 {24/3} 0 0
SEISMO {25/0} 9891 3200
PENTAGON-TIP {26/2} 0 0
USC-ISID {27/0} 674435 2273
ISI-PNG11 {27/1} 22960 2121
ISI-VAXA {27/2} 145453 123
RAND-RELAY {27/3} 0 0
ARPA-DMS {28/0} 0 0
ARPA1-TAC {28/1} 31555 17
ARPA2-TAC {28/2} 113513 20
ARPA-PENGUIN {28/3} 3181 0
BRL {29/0} 0 0
ABER-TAC {29/2} 3359 94
BRL-BMD {29/3} 294 3
BROOKS-TAC {30/0} 467 0
CCA-UNIX {31/0} 0 0
CCA-VMS {31/1} 95 0
CCA-TAC {31/2} 465 0
MIT-DEVMULTICS {31/3} 153 0
PARC-MAXC {32/0} 0 0
KESTREL {32/3} 11 0
NPS0 {33/0} 4777 99
FNOC {33/1} 0 0
NPS-TAC {33/2} 27393 0
FNOC-SECURE {33/3} 13284 103
LBL0 {34/0} 0 0
LBL-UNIX {34/1} 15283 4467
NOSC-SECURE2 {35/0} 116068 19
NOSC-SDL {35/1} 428 3322
ACCAT-TAC {35/2} 215438 3
NOSC-SECURE3 {35/3} 4151 19
COINS-TAS {36/0} 24 1019
CINCPACFLT-WM {36/1} 59237 465
ALOHA-TAC {36/2} 19133 0
PURDUE {37/0} 0 0
CSNET-PURDUE {37/2} 13660 0
BRAGG-GWY1 {38/0} 97935 5593
BRAGG-STA1 {38/1} 0 0
BRAGG-TAC {38/2} 263600 0
NCC-TAC {40/0} 135210 9858
PSAT-GATEWAY {40/1} 0 0
HP-3000 {40/2} 0 0
SATNET-GATEWAY {40/3} 204826 11934
REDST-TAC {41/2} 0 0
OFFICE-1 {43/0} 0 0
OFFICE-2 {43/1} 0 0
OFFICE-3 {43/2} 6 0
OFFICE-7 {43/3} 2831 0
MIT-XX {44/0} 162779 0
LL-ASG {44/1} 0 0
MIT-TSTGW {44/2} 0 0
MIT-MC {44/3} 0 0
COLLINS-PR {46/0} 0 0
COLLNS-TAC {46/2} 12519 0
OKC-UNIX {46/3} 1848 0
WPAFB0 {47/0} 0 0
WPAFB-AFWAL {47/1} 0 0
WPAFB-TIP {47/2} 0 0
AFWL0 {48/0} 0 0
AFWL-TIP {48/2} 0 0
BBNB {49/0} 87318 0
CRONUS-GATEW {49/1} 27909 5535
BBNC {49/3} 97118 0
DARCOM-TAC {50/2} 40687 0
SRI-C3PO {51/1} 72141 17734
SRI-UNIX {51/2} 0 0
SRI-R2D2 {51/3} 86299 14832
ISI-VAXB {52/0} 0 0
USC-ISIE {52/1} 279258 17223
USC-ISIF {52/2} 89846 37614
USC-ISIB {52/3} 66886 38943
AFSC-AD {53/0} 16193 875
NCSC {53/1} 0 0
AFSC-DEV {53/2} 1 979
MARTIN {53/3} 0 0
CIT-20 {54/0} 9424 18957
CIT-VAX {54/1} 941 26514
ACC {54/2} 0 0
JPL-VAX {54/3} 258 160
ANL0 {55/0} 0 0
ANL-MCS {55/1} 0 0
SUMEX-AIM {56/0} 0 0
SU-DSN {56/1} 0 0
TYCHO {57/0} 0 0
COINS-GATEWAY {57/1} 0 0
NYU0 {58/0} 0 0
BNL {58/1} 0 0
RUTGERS {58/2} 0 0
NUSC-NL {58/3} 0 0
ETAC {59/0} 0 0
CENTACS-MMP {60/0} 0 0
CORADCOM-TIP {60/2} 0 0
CENTACS-TF {60/3} 0 0
STLA-TAC {61/2} 44088 0
UTEXAS-11 {62/0} 0 0
UTEXAS-20 {62/1} 0 0
BBN-RSM {63/0} 4162 0
BBN-TAC {63/1} 14272 18
11/40-TESTGATE {63/3} 0 0
TIU-TEST-GATE {63/5} 0 0
VAN-TEST-GATE {63/6} 0 0
MARTIN-B {64/1} 0 0
ROBINS-TAC {64/2} 711 0
ROBINS-UNIX {64/3} 0 0
AFSC-SD {65/0} 0 0
AFSD-TAC {65/1} 29836 1143
AEROSPACE {65/2} 2534 894
MITRE-BEDFORD {66/0} 0 0
AFGL1 {66/1} 0 0
AFGL-TAC {66/2} 16212 10
AFSC-HQ {67/0} 0 0
ANDRWS-TAC {67/1} 1072 41
USGS1-MULTICS {68/0} 0 0
USGS1-AMDAHL {68/2} 0 0
USGS1-TAC {68/3} 356 0
USGS2-MULTICS {69/0} 0 0
USGS2-TAC {69/1} 12911 0
USAFA-GW {69/2} 0 0
USGS3-MULTICS {70/0} 0 0
USGS3-TAC {70/1} 468 2
CLARK-IG {71/1} 7251 0
BBN-CLXX {71/2} 66404 0
BBN-NOC {72/0} 21178 394
BBN-UNIX {72/1} 0 0
BBNP {72/2} 97348 146938
RCCGW {72/3} 298733 134756
SRI-NIC {73/0} 46241 1406
SRI-WARF {73/1} 7296 150
SRI-AI {73/2} 0 0
SRI-IU {73/3} 70 43
WSMR-TAC {74/2} 953 0
YUMA-TAC {75/2} 463 0
MIT-GW {77/0} 82354 3236
MIT-TAC {77/2} 73190 1924
UCB-ARPA {78/0} 4472 0
UCB-C70 {78/1} 0 0
UCB-INGVAX {78/2} 0 0
MCCLELLAN {78/3} 871 0
DEC-2136 {79/0} 0 0
DEC-MARLBORO {79/1} 0 0
HI-MULTICS {80/0} 278 24
SAC-TAC2 {80/1} 0 0
SAC-TAC {80/2} 165960 0
SAC-GW {80/3} 0 0
NALCON {81/0} 0 0
DTNSRDC {81/1} 0 0
DAVID-TAC {81/2} 10288 110
NEMS {81/3} 0 0
BBNT {82/0} 0 0
BBN-VAX {82/1} 48074 211
BBN-INOC {82/2} 9125 0
BBNS {82/3} 203973 2972
BBN-NOC2 {82/6} 2029 2590
NSWC-DL {84/0} 0 0
NSWC-TAC {84/2} 3072 3
NWC-387A {85/0} 0 0
NWC-ELF {85/1} 0 0
CHINA-TAC {85/2} 340 0
NWC-387B {85/3} 0 0
SANDIA0 {87/0} 0 0
NLM-MCS {88/0} 0 0
WASHINGTON0 {91/0} 0 0
WASH-TAC {91/2} 1713 23
UW-VLSI {91/3} 1990 34
NUSC-NPT {92/2} 0 0
OFFICE-8 {93/0} 0 0
OFFICE-10 {93/1} 0 0
UWISC0 {94/0} 0 0
CSNET-SH {94/1} 0 0
S1-GATEWAY {95/0} 3 0
S1-A {95/1} 0 0
S1-B {95/2} 0 0
S1-C {95/3} 0 0
UDEL-RELAY {96/0} 0 0
UDEL-TCP {96/1} 5577 174
UDEL-EE {96/2} 8763 173
PAXRV-TAC {97/3} 466 0
------------------------------
END OF TCP-IP DIGEST
********************
END OF DOCUMENT
| ISSN 1742-948X 01 (Online) | 2005/03/01 | Copyright 2002-2008 securitydigest.org. All rights reserved. |