----MESSAGE-BEGIN---- <1982110319250000> Mail-from: ARPANET host BRL rcvd at 4-Nov-82 0405-PST UUCP-From: decvax!brl-bmd!tcp-ip Sender: Mike Muuss From: TCP-IP at BRL To: TCP-IP at BRL Date: 1 Nov 1982 Subject: TCP-IP Digest, Vol 1 #24 Via: Brl-Bmd; 4 Nov 82 0:25-EST TCP/IP Digest Monday, 1 Nov 1982 Volume 1 : Issue 24 Today's Topics: SRI 2.8 BSD with TCP/IP for PDP-11s now being distributed. Clarification about DTI TCP/IP product "ACCESS" Courier: The Remote Procedure Call Protocol: In InterNet? TCP-only throughput figures of ArpaNet DCEC gateway up on SatNet! Results of DCEC Gateway Test Looking for DECNet between UNIX and VMS on VAXen. Looking for TCP/IP for Bell UNIX System III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- LIMITED DISTRIBUTION For Research Use Only --- Not for Public Distribution ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 13 Oct 1982 at 2322-PDT From: Bill Croft Subject: distribution announcement Distribution of 2.8 BSD with TCP/IP. Our port of the 4.1a BSD VAX networking code to the PDP11/44 or /70 is now essentially complete. We have been running the software on our SRI-PRMH and SRI-WARF systems for about a month now with very good results. The local net drivers tested and running at this time are: INTERLAN 10 megabit ethernet, ACC LH-DH, and our locally built SRI1822. Converting an existing VAX network device driver to run with the 11 requires editing just a few lines. The DEC IMP11A driver has been converted but not yet tested. I wish we had the time to make this distribution a really polished one, but we don't. We make the assumption that you already have installed 2.8 BSD on your machine, and understand kernel configuration and debugging. If you brought up an early 2.8 distribution, I think you qualify. To avoid licensing difficulties, we are restricting distribution to holders of Berkeley UNIX licenses (x.x BSD). Within a few months we hope that the PDP11 group at Berkeley can take over and incorporate this distribution into their next 2.82 release. We are making this release available from SRI due to the fast approaching ARPA TCP conversion deadline. The tape we can send you contains the new kernel, user level network code, and other necessary tools (such as "cpp" from the VAX that understands long identifier names). Here is a copy of the entry recently submitted to SRI-NIC, for the "tcp-ip-status.txt" document: 5. SRI UNIX 11/44,11/70 V7 (2.8 BSD) Date: 13 October 1982 From: Bill Croft This TCP was ported from the Berkeley VAX 4.1a version. IP, TCP, ICMP, UDP, and RAW layers are all kernel resident. This means we can run faster than older PDP11 TCPs that require auxiliary daemons (such as BBN's V6 or 3COM's UNET). Typical TCP interprocess thruput between a VAX 750 running 4.1a BSD and the 11/44 running 2.8 BSD is 300000 baud; this was measured with INTERLAN 10 megabit ethernet hardware. For programmers, there is easy access to all layers of protocol, so that (e.g.) IP or UDP services can be written. Service protocols available are all of those supplied with the VAX version: FTP, TELNET, ECHO, rlogin, rsh, rexec, talk, routing daemons. 1. Hardware - currently requires an I/D machine, such as an 11/44 or 11/70 with at least a half megabyte of memory. The total kernel size (text, data, and buffers) is about 200K bytes; so it won't fit if you have only 256K bytes. Although this sounds like a lot of bytes, comparison with our older 2.8 BSD NCP-only system shows that the kernel has only grown by about 60K bytes. This is very reasonable considering that the entire network is now resident versus the NCP case which used a hulking NCP daemon. A number of net interfaces are supported. See the Berkeley VAX documentation. The ones specifically ported to the 11 are: INTERLAN 10 megabit ethernet, ACC LH/DH, SRI 1822, DEC IMP11A. Porting a new VAX interface driver to the 11 involves changing less than 10 lines of code. 2. Software - ported from the 4.1a Berkeley VAX UNIX system. Manipulates I and D space mapping registers to reference more than 65K bytes of instructions and data at a time. 3. Documentation - supplied on tape as manual pages. Contact for further information: Dan Chernikoff, dan@sri-tsc, (415) 859 4144. We can mail a copy of our distribution tape. Eventually the software will be incorporated in Berkeley's next PDP11 distribution (2.82 BSD). This tape is supplied as-is to 2.8 BSD licenses, with no warrantees or support expressed or implied. The terms of your original Berkeley license apply: the software cannot be resold or redistributed. To get the software, send a magnetic tape and a copy of your 2.8 or 4.x license to: Dan Chernikoff SRI International 333 Ravenswood Ave. Menlo Park, CA 94025 As far as updates and bug fixes go, this mailing list (ucbtcp11@sri-tsc) can be used as a distribution point. Send a note to dan@sri-tsc to add or delete names from the list. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1982 1703-CDT From: grg at Dti (Gary Grossman) Subject: TCP/IP for VAX/VMS This is to clarify a misconception that might be fostered by the note from Y. Pin Foo in TCP-IP Digest #1:23. Digital Technology Incorporated (DTI) does indeed market software including TCP/IP under the name "ACCESS". Our software is available for connection to the ARPANET via the ACC LH/DH-11. It is also available in an Ethernet version using 3COM's Unibus Ethernet interface. The only 3COM software that we use is the device driver that is supplied with the 3COM hardware. All other software, including IP, TCP, TELNET, FTP, and MAIL, was produced at DTI. The first copy of the software package costs $15K. Additional copies to the same site cost $6K. Gary Grossman ------------------------------ Date: 18 Oct 1982 13:10:48-EST From: Chris Kent Via: Brl; 18 Oct 82 15:20-EDT Am in the process of reading this "Xerox System Integration Standard", and was wondering if anyone had thought about implementing this on top of IP and/or TCP... and what progress you've made. Cheers, chris ------------------------------ Date: 7 Oct 1982 9:01:06 EDT (Thursday) From: Andrew Malis Subject: TCP-only throughput figures Mike, Vint Cerf suggested that you may be interested in including the following figures in some form in the TCP-IP digest. Basically, they are a comparison of the number of packets going through the net during the TCP-only test, as compared to the previous day during the same time period. They show that during the test, the network had about 47% of the number of packets flowing as it did during the previous day at the same time. You may want to include the figures as is, or you may want to just present the totals. I'll leave that up to you. Andy Malis HOST THROUGHPUT SUMMARY, OCTOBER 1ST Packets Received Inter-node Intra-Node Total From Fri Oct 1 12:13:51 1982 To Fri Oct 1 13:02:44 1982 Net Totals: 338765 33679 372444 From Fri Oct 1 13:02:46 1982 To Fri Oct 1 13:51:39 1982 Net Totals: 336164 82056 418220 From Fri Oct 1 13:51:39 1982 To Fri Oct 1 14:40:32 1982 Net Totals: 446443 40376 486819 From Fri Oct 1 14:40:34 1982 To Fri Oct 1 15:29:27 1982 Net Totals: 451627 66647 518274 From Fri Oct 1 15:29:27 1982 To Fri Oct 1 16:00:00 1982 Net Totals: 399462 42043 441505 ________________________________________ Net Totals: 1972461 264801 2237262 ======================================================== HOST THROUGHPUT SUMMARY, SEPTEMBER 30TH Packets Received Inter-node Intra-Node Total From Thu Sep 30 12:17:18 1982 To Thu Sep 30 13:06:11 1982 Net Totals: 662445 74644 737089 From Thu Sep 30 13:06:19 1982 To Thu Sep 30 13:55:12 1982 Net Totals: 671169 174553 845722 From Thu Sep 30 13:55:14 1982 To Thu Sep 30 14:44:07 1982 Net Totals: 823234 156222 979456 From Thu Sep 30 14:44:17 1982 To Thu Sep 30 15:33:10 1982 Net Totals: 905026 138187 1043213 From Thu Sep 30 15:33:07 1982 To Thu Sep 30 16:00:00 1982 Net Totals: 987427 132308 1119735 ________________________________________ Net Totals: 4049301 675914 4725215 ------------------------------ Date: 26 Oct 1982 18:55:33 EDT (Tuesday) From: Michael Brescia To: Cain at Edn-Unix, mcneill at Bbn-Unix, control at Bbn-Unix Subject: DCEC gateway up on satnet Redistributed-by: Bob Hinden Redistributed-to: gateway-info at BBN-UNIX Redistributed-date: 27 Oct 1982 8:49:50 EDT (Wednesday) Gateway 15 DCEC 10.1.0.20 (Arpanet) Tue Oct 26 18:47:25 1982 Version 1002 Interfaces: UP: DCEC 4.0.0.24 (Satnet) !!!!!!!! UP: DCEC 10.1.0.20 (Arpanet) UP: DCEC 21.0.0.2 (EDN) Neighbors: UP: NTARE 4.0.0.38 (Satnet) !!!!!! UP: UCL 4.0.0.60 (Satnet) !!!! ... gstatus terminated at Tue Oct 26 18:47:26 1982 ------ thanks to dale, peter, mike, mike, bill, cathy, &c, and WUI The line from DCEC to ETAM has come up for real. DCEC gateway sees the satnet, and also its satnet neighbors. That ought to create real fun for the gateway routing. We expect to watch this for a while to make sure it settles in for good. Mike ------------------------------ Date: 29 Oct 1982 11:18:37 EDT (Friday) From: Bob Hinden Subject: Results of DCEC Gateway Test To: gateway-info at Bbn-Unix Yesterdays test, which consisted of looping away the VDH line of the BBN gateway, was very successfull. All the traffic which normally used the BBN gateway as a route between Satnet and the Arpanet was redirected to the DCEC gateway. I have included throughput data for the period before and during the test, showing that the traffic load switched to the DCEC gateway after the VDH line was looped. [ Here is the correct throughput data for the DCEC gateway test. The first message included the data for the period before the test twice. -Bob Hinden ] Throughput Summary from 0300 to 0900 EST 28 Oct 82 GWY GWY RCVD RCVD IP % IP DEST % DST NO. NAME DGRAMS BYTES ERRORS ERRORS UNRCH UNRCH 2 BBN 77,702 3,328,454 0 0.00% 8 0.01% 15 DCEC 54,625 2,342,132 0 0.00% 13 0.02% TOTALS 132,327 5,670,586 0 0.00% 21 0.02% GWY GWY SENT SENT DROPPED % DROPPED NO. NAME DGRAMS BYTES DGRAMS DGRAMS 2 BBN 82,797 3,417,237 0 0.00% 15 DCEC 53,983 2,222,390 0 0.00% TOTALS 136,780 5,639,627 0 0.00% Throughput Summary 0900 to 1500 EST 28 Oct 82 GWY GWY RCVD RCVD IP % IP DEST % DST NO. NAME DGRAMS BYTES ERRORS ERRORS UNRCH UNRCH 2 BBN 43,025 1,265,324 1 0.00% 19 0.04% 15 DCEC 101,881 4,979,852 1 0.00% 154 0.15% TOTALS 144,906 6,245,176 2 0.00% 173 0.12% GWY GWY SENT SENT DROPPED % DROPPED NO. NAME DGRAMS BYTES DGRAMS DGRAMS 2 BBN 49,409 1,402,482 0 0.00% 15 DCEC 102,607 4,873,176 4 0.00% TOTALS 152,016 6,275,658 4 0.00% We are now seeing evidence that having two gateways between the Arpanet and Satnet is improving the quality of service for the Satnet users. This in conjuction with some TCP fixes made to the TAC software should result in more reliable service. Bob ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 06 Oct 82 15:46:52 CDT From: estell at NWC-387B Subject: VMS to UNIX software for DECNet We are looking for a reliable and affordable software package that implements a "DEC Net" interface between a UNIX host and a VMS host (both VAX computers). The idea is that, if we must have UNIX as an ARPANET interface, we want to be able to connect that host VAX to our other VAX computers, via DECNet. Also, we have a VAX here at NWC that is running UNIX now; someday they may want to join our NWCNet (LAN), via "DEC Net." Do you know of such software? If not, do you WANT to know about it? (i.e., If I go hunting, do you want to be informed of my findings?) Please reply to ESTELL at NWC-387B. Thanks, Bob ------------------------------ Date: 15 Oct 82 13:42:29-EDT (Fri) From: Rick To: tcp-ip at BRL cc: unix-wizards at Sri-Unix Subject: TCP/IP &/or NCP for 3.0 UNIX We are running UNIX 3.0 on an 11/70 and we're trying to get it running on the net. We are currently using the CSNET as a gateway to Arpanet, but want to get our system(s) directly into it. We are looking at various places to get a reasonable NCP (short-term) and TCP/IP (longer) that we can port over to 3.0. Is there anyone else out there in UNIX-land who is trying to get to NCP and/or TCP/IP under these circumstances? rick ------------------------------ Date: 18 Oct 1982 23:28:47-EST From: Chris Kent Reply-to: cak at Purdue To: rturner.xls-onyx02 at Udel-Relay, tcp-ip at BRL Subject: Re: TCP/IP &/or NCP for 3.0 UNIX Seems like you could get the Greep NCP front end that runs on VAXen to work. But I'm not sure it would be worth the effort for a little over two months of access. As for TCP, you might want to look at the work that Bill Croft has just completed. Are you tied to a 3.0 kernel? If not, you can just put his up (it's based on 2.8bsd). Otherwise, you have some work to do, but his code should be a good guideline. Cheers, chris ------------------------------ END OF TCP-IP DIGEST ******************** ----MESSAGE-END---- ----MESSAGE-BEGIN---- [bnews.brl-bmd.419] <1982110402163200> Message-ID: Newsgroups: fa.tcp-ip X-Path: utzoo!decvax!brl-bmd!TCP-IP@BRL From: TCP-IP@BRL Date: Thu Nov 4 07:16:32 1982 Subject: TCP-IP Digest, Vol 1 #24 X-Google-Info: Converted from the original B-News header Posted: Thu Nov 4 01:59:19 1982 Received: Thu Nov 4 07:16:32 1982 Expires: Thu Nov 4 01:00:00 1982 TCP/IP Digest Monday, 1 Nov 1982 Volume 1 : Issue 24 Today's Topics: SRI 2.8 BSD with TCP/IP for PDP-11s now being distributed. Clarification about DTI TCP/IP product "ACCESS" Courier: The Remote Procedure Call Protocol: In InterNet? TCP-only throughput figures of ArpaNet DCEC gateway up on SatNet! Results of DCEC Gateway Test Looking for DECNet between UNIX and VMS on VAXen. Looking for TCP/IP for Bell UNIX System III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- LIMITED DISTRIBUTION For Research Use Only --- Not for Public Distribution ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 13 Oct 1982 at 2322-PDT From: Bill Croft Subject: distribution announcement Distribution of 2.8 BSD with TCP/IP. Our port of the 4.1a BSD VAX networking code to the PDP11/44 or /70 is now essentially complete. We have been running the software on our SRI-PRMH and SRI-WARF systems for about a month now with very good results. The local net drivers tested and running at this time are: INTERLAN 10 megabit ethernet, ACC LH-DH, and our locally built SRI1822. Converting an existing VAX network device driver to run with the 11 requires editing just a few lines. The DEC IMP11A driver has been converted but not yet tested. I wish we had the time to make this distribution a really polished one, but we don't. We make the assumption that you already have installed 2.8 BSD on your machine, and understand kernel configuration and debugging. If you brought up an early 2.8 distribution, I think you qualify. To avoid licensing difficulties, we are restricting distribution to holders of Berkeley UNIX licenses (x.x BSD). Within a few months we hope that the PDP11 group at Berkeley can take over and incorporate this distribution into their next 2.82 release. We are making this release available from SRI due to the fast approaching ARPA TCP conversion deadline. The tape we can send you contains the new kernel, user level network code, and other necessary tools (such as "cpp" from the VAX that understands long identifier names). Here is a copy of the entry recently submitted to SRI-NIC, for the "tcp-ip-status.txt" document: 5. SRI UNIX 11/44,11/70 V7 (2.8 BSD) Date: 13 October 1982 From: Bill Croft This TCP was ported from the Berkeley VAX 4.1a version. IP, TCP, ICMP, UDP, and RAW layers are all kernel resident. This means we can run faster than older PDP11 TCPs that require auxiliary daemons (such as BBN's V6 or 3COM's UNET). Typical TCP interprocess thruput between a VAX 750 running 4.1a BSD and the 11/44 running 2.8 BSD is 300000 baud; this was measured with INTERLAN 10 megabit ethernet hardware. For programmers, there is easy access to all layers of protocol, so that (e.g.) IP or UDP services can be written. Service protocols available are all of those supplied with the VAX version: FTP, TELNET, ECHO, rlogin, rsh, rexec, talk, routing daemons. 1. Hardware - currently requires an I/D machine, such as an 11/44 or 11/70 with at least a half megabyte of memory. The total kernel size (text, data, and buffers) is about 200K bytes; so it won't fit if you have only 256K bytes. Although this sounds like a lot of bytes, comparison with our older 2.8 BSD NCP-only system shows that the kernel has only grown by about 60K bytes. This is very reasonable considering that the entire network is now resident versus the NCP case which used a hulking NCP daemon. A number of net interfaces are supported. See the Berkeley VAX documentation. The ones specifically ported to the 11 are: INTERLAN 10 megabit ethernet, ACC LH/DH, SRI 1822, DEC IMP11A. Porting a new VAX interface driver to the 11 involves changing less than 10 lines of code. 2. Software - ported from the 4.1a Berkeley VAX UNIX system. Manipulates I and D space mapping registers to reference more than 65K bytes of instructions and data at a time. 3. Documentation - supplied on tape as manual pages. Contact for further information: Dan Chernikoff, dan@sri-tsc, (415) 859 4144. We can mail a copy of our distribution tape. Eventually the software will be incorporated in Berkeley's next PDP11 distribution (2.82 BSD). This tape is supplied as-is to 2.8 BSD licenses, with no warrantees or support expressed or implied. The terms of your original Berkeley license apply: the software cannot be resold or redistributed. To get the software, send a magnetic tape and a copy of your 2.8 or 4.x license to: Dan Chernikoff SRI International 333 Ravenswood Ave. Menlo Park, CA 94025 As far as updates and bug fixes go, this mailing list (ucbtcp11@sri-tsc) can be used as a distribution point. Send a note to dan@sri-tsc to add or delete names from the list. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1982 1703-CDT From: grg at Dti (Gary Grossman) Subject: TCP/IP for VAX/VMS This is to clarify a misconception that might be fostered by the note from Y. Pin Foo in TCP-IP Digest #1:23. Digital Technology Incorporated (DTI) does indeed market software including TCP/IP under the name "ACCESS". Our software is available for connection to the ARPANET via the ACC LH/DH-11. It is also available in an Ethernet version using 3COM's Unibus Ethernet interface. The only 3COM software that we use is the device driver that is supplied with the 3COM hardware. All other software, including IP, TCP, TELNET, FTP, and MAIL, was produced at DTI. The first copy of the software package costs $15K. Additional copies to the same site cost $6K. Gary Grossman ------------------------------ Date: 18 Oct 1982 13:10:48-EST From: Chris Kent Via: Brl; 18 Oct 82 15:20-EDT Am in the process of reading this "Xerox System Integration Standard", and was wondering if anyone had thought about implementing this on top of IP and/or TCP... and what progress you've made. Cheers, chris ------------------------------ Date: 7 Oct 1982 9:01:06 EDT (Thursday) From: Andrew Malis Subject: TCP-only throughput figures Mike, Vint Cerf suggested that you may be interested in including the following figures in some form in the TCP-IP digest. Basically, they are a comparison of the number of packets going through the net during the TCP-only test, as compared to the previous day during the same time period. They show that during the test, the network had about 47% of the number of packets flowing as it did during the previous day at the same time. You may want to include the figures as is, or you may want to just present the totals. I'll leave that up to you. Andy Malis HOST THROUGHPUT SUMMARY, OCTOBER 1ST Packets Received Inter-node Intra-Node Total >From Fri Oct 1 12:13:51 1982 To Fri Oct 1 13:02:44 1982 Net Totals: 338765 33679 372444 >From Fri Oct 1 13:02:46 1982 To Fri Oct 1 13:51:39 1982 Net Totals: 336164 82056 418220 >From Fri Oct 1 13:51:39 1982 To Fri Oct 1 14:40:32 1982 Net Totals: 446443 40376 486819 >From Fri Oct 1 14:40:34 1982 To Fri Oct 1 15:29:27 1982 Net Totals: 451627 66647 518274 >From Fri Oct 1 15:29:27 1982 To Fri Oct 1 16:00:00 1982 Net Totals: 399462 42043 441505 ________________________________________ Net Totals: 1972461 264801 2237262 ======================================================== HOST THROUGHPUT SUMMARY, SEPTEMBER 30TH Packets Received Inter-node Intra-Node Total >From Thu Sep 30 12:17:18 1982 To Thu Sep 30 13:06:11 1982 Net Totals: 662445 74644 737089 >From Thu Sep 30 13:06:19 1982 To Thu Sep 30 13:55:12 1982 Net Totals: 671169 174553 845722 >From Thu Sep 30 13:55:14 1982 To Thu Sep 30 14:44:07 1982 Net Totals: 823234 156222 979456 >From Thu Sep 30 14:44:17 1982 To Thu Sep 30 15:33:10 1982 Net Totals: 905026 138187 1043213 >From Thu Sep 30 15:33:07 1982 To Thu Sep 30 16:00:00 1982 Net Totals: 987427 132308 1119735 ________________________________________ Net Totals: 4049301 675914 4725215 ------------------------------ Date: 26 Oct 1982 18:55:33 EDT (Tuesday) From: Michael Brescia To: Cain at Edn-Unix, mcneill at Bbn-Unix, control at Bbn-Unix Subject: DCEC gateway up on satnet Redistributed-by: Bob Hinden Redistributed-to: gateway-info at BBN-UNIX Redistributed-date: 27 Oct 1982 8:49:50 EDT (Wednesday) Gateway 15 DCEC 10.1.0.20 (Arpanet) Tue Oct 26 18:47:25 1982 Version 1002 Interfaces: UP: DCEC 4.0.0.24 (Satnet) !!!!!!!! UP: DCEC 10.1.0.20 (Arpanet) UP: DCEC 21.0.0.2 (EDN) Neighbors: UP: NTARE 4.0.0.38 (Satnet) !!!!!! UP: UCL 4.0.0.60 (Satnet) !!!! ... gstatus terminated at Tue Oct 26 18:47:26 1982 ------ thanks to dale, peter, mike, mike, bill, cathy, &c, and WUI The line from DCEC to ETAM has come up for real. DCEC gateway sees the satnet, and also its satnet neighbors. That ought to create real fun for the gateway routing. We expect to watch this for a while to make sure it settles in for good. Mike ------------------------------ Date: 29 Oct 1982 11:18:37 EDT (Friday) From: Bob Hinden Subject: Results of DCEC Gateway Test To: gateway-info at Bbn-Unix Yesterdays test, which consisted of looping away the VDH line of the BBN gateway, was very successfull. All the traffic which normally used the BBN gateway as a route between Satnet and the Arpanet was redirected to the DCEC gateway. I have included throughput data for the period before and during the test, showing that the traffic load switched to the DCEC gateway after the VDH line was looped. [ Here is the correct throughput data for the DCEC gateway test. The first message included the data for the period before the test twice. -Bob Hinden ] Throughput Summary from 0300 to 0900 EST 28 Oct 82 GWY GWY RCVD RCVD IP % IP DEST % DST NO. NAME DGRAMS BYTES ERRORS ERRORS UNRCH UNRCH 2 BBN 77,702 3,328,454 0 0.00% 8 0.01% 15 DCEC 54,625 2,342,132 0 0.00% 13 0.02% TOTALS 132,327 5,670,586 0 0.00% 21 0.02% GWY GWY SENT SENT DROPPED % DROPPED NO. NAME DGRAMS BYTES DGRAMS DGRAMS 2 BBN 82,797 3,417,237 0 0.00% 15 DCEC 53,983 2,222,390 0 0.00% TOTALS 136,780 5,639,627 0 0.00% Throughput Summary 0900 to 1500 EST 28 Oct 82 GWY GWY RCVD RCVD IP % IP DEST % DST NO. NAME DGRAMS BYTES ERRORS ERRORS UNRCH UNRCH 2 BBN 43,025 1,265,324 1 0.00% 19 0.04% 15 DCEC 101,881 4,979,852 1 0.00% 154 0.15% TOTALS 144,906 6,245,176 2 0.00% 173 0.12% GWY GWY SENT SENT DROPPED % DROPPED NO. NAME DGRAMS BYTES DGRAMS DGRAMS 2 BBN 49,409 1,402,482 0 0.00% 15 DCEC 102,607 4,873,176 4 0.00% TOTALS 152,016 6,275,658 4 0.00% We are now seeing evidence that having two gateways between the Arpanet and Satnet is improving the quality of service for the Satnet users. This in conjuction with some TCP fixes made to the TAC software should result in more reliable service. Bob ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 06 Oct 82 15:46:52 CDT From: estell at NWC-387B Subject: VMS to UNIX software for DECNet We are looking for a reliable and affordable software package that implements a "DEC Net" interface between a UNIX host and a VMS host (both VAX computers). The idea is that, if we must have UNIX as an ARPANET interface, we want to be able to connect that host VAX to our other VAX computers, via DECNet. Also, we have a VAX here at NWC that is running UNIX now; someday they may want to join our NWCNet (LAN), via "DEC Net." Do you know of such software? If not, do you WANT to know about it? (i.e., If I go hunting, do you want to be informed of my findings?) Please reply to ESTELL at NWC-387B. Thanks, Bob ------------------------------ Date: 15 Oct 82 13:42:29-EDT (Fri) From: Rick To: tcp-ip at BRL cc: unix-wizards at Sri-Unix Subject: TCP/IP &/or NCP for 3.0 UNIX We are running UNIX 3.0 on an 11/70 and we're trying to get it running on the net. We are currently using the CSNET as a gateway to Arpanet, but want to get our system(s) directly into it. We are looking at various places to get a reasonable NCP (short-term) and TCP/IP (longer) that we can port over to 3.0. Is there anyone else out there in UNIX-land who is trying to get to NCP and/or TCP/IP under these circumstances? rick ------------------------------ Date: 18 Oct 1982 23:28:47-EST From: Chris Kent Reply-to: cak at Purdue To: rturner.xls-onyx02 at Udel-Relay, tcp-ip at BRL Subject: Re: TCP/IP &/or NCP for 3.0 UNIX Seems like you could get the Greep NCP front end that runs on VAXen to work. But I'm not sure it would be worth the effort for a little over two months of access. As for TCP, you might want to look at the work that Bill Croft has just completed. Are you tied to a 3.0 kernel? If not, you can just put his up (it's based on 2.8bsd). Otherwise, you have some work to do, but his code should be a good guideline. Cheers, chris ------------------------------ END OF TCP-IP DIGEST ******************** ----MESSAGE-END---- ----MESSAGE-BEGIN---- <1982111604433400> Mail-from: ARPANET host 1200000122 rcvd at 16-Nov-82 0700-PST Date: 16 Nov 1982 9:43:34 EST (Tuesday) From: Andrew Malis Subject: TCP-only throughput, 11/15 To: cerf@usc-isi, dcacode252@usc-isi, gpark@bbnc, tcp-ip@sri-nic, gurwitz at BBN-UNIX, herman at BBN-UNIX, haverty at BBN-UNIX, postel@usc-isif, lynch@isib, kahn@usc-isi, DCLARK.INP@mit-multics, mills@usc-isie, feinler@sri-nic Cc: malis at BBN-UNIX The total ARPANET throughput for yesterday's TCP-only test was 9,466,256 packets. This is 62% of the total throughput for the previous Monday, 11/8, when 15,283,672 packets were passed by the net. Regards, Andy Malis for the NOC ----MESSAGE-END---- ----MESSAGE-BEGIN---- <1982111805351400> Mail-from: ARPANET host 1200000122 rcvd at 18-Nov-82 0807-PST Date: 18 Nov 1982 10:35:14 EST (Thursday) From: Andrew Malis Subject: Host-by-host breakdown, 11/15/82 To: dhenry@bbnc, gpark@bbnc, heiden@bbnc, dcacodeb627@bbnb Cc: cerf@usc-isi, dcacode252@usc-isi, tcp-ip@sri-nic, postel@usc-isif, lynch@isib, kahn@usc-isi, DCLARK.INP%mit-multics@usc-isid, mills@usc-isid, feinler@sri-nic, herman at BBN-UNIX, haverty at BBN-UNIX, gurwitz at BBN-UNIX, malis at BBN-UNIX, miller@sri-nic The following is the host-by-host throughput breakdown for the TCP test on the 15th. Note that the starting time for the data is 00:48; since the IMPs weren't completely disabled for NCP until 00:10 or so, the first recording interval for the data has been discarded. Hosts that were only running NCP (or were down for the period) will have zeros in both columns. Unfortunately, it is not easy to correlate this with information about which hosts were up or down during the day, because the NOC logger only records host state transistions, and hosts with no up/down transitions during the day would not show up in the log. If information is needed about a specific host, you can get back to me, and I can check for any transitions between 00:00 on the 15th and now, and compare this to its current state. However, this would take me a while if I were to do it for every host in the net. Also note that IMPs 33, 35, and 36 had NCP enabled during the test, for the CINCPAC demo. By the time of the next test in December, the PLIs should be fixed to not use link 0, and such enabling will not be necessary. If I can be of any further assistance, please let me know. Regards, Andy Malis For the NOC ---------------------------------------------------------------- Host Throughput From Mon Nov 15 00:48:56 1982 To Tue Nov 16 00:00:03 1982 Host Name {node/ Packets Sent host} Inter-Node Intra-Node UCLA-ATS { 1/0} 0 0 UCLA-CCN { 1/1} 522 1587 UCLA-SECURITY { 1/2} 0 0 UCLA-LOCUS { 1/3} 648 0 SRI-NSC11 { 2/0} 0 0 SRI-KL { 2/1} 0 0 SRI-CSL { 2/2} 0 0 SRI-TSC { 2/3} 0 0 NOSC-CC { 3/0} 0 0 NOSC-SPEL { 3/1} 0 0 LOGICON { 3/2} 0 0 NPRDC { 3/3} 0 0 UTAH-CS { 4/0} 0 0 UTAH-TAC { 4/2} 470 0 UTAH-20 { 4/3} 0 0 BBNF { 5/0} 8698 31577 BBNG { 5/1} 55864 12195 BBN-PTIP { 5/2} 49579 68004 BBNA { 5/3} 5504 13730 MIT-MULTICS { 6/0} 32083 0 MIT-DMS { 6/1} 0 0 MIT-AI { 6/2} 0 0 MIT-ML { 6/3} 0 0 RAND-AI { 7/0} 0 0 RAND-RELAY { 7/1} 0 0 RAND-TAC { 7/2} 5174 0 RAND-UNIX { 7/3} 0 0 NRL0 { 8/0} 0 0 NSWC-WO { 8/2} 0 0 NRL-TOPS10 { 8/3} 0 0 NRL-ARCTAN { 8/6} 0 0 NRL-CSS { 8/7} 0 0 HARV-10 { 9/0} 0 0 YALE { 9/2} 0 0 LL {10/0} 0 0 LL-TCP {10/1} 107 0 LL-XN {10/2} 0 0 LL-11 {10/3} 1717 0 SU-AI {11/0} 0 0 STAN-TAC {11/2} 63961 16 SU-SCORE {11/3} 0 0 DTI-VMS {12/0} 2810 199 DTI0 {12/1} 0 0 GUNTER-UNIX {13/0} 0 0 GUNTER-ADM {13/1} 32378 231372 GUNTER-TAC {13/2} 5862 207057 CMU-10B {14/0} 0 0 CMU-10A {14/1} 19 6049 CMU-GATEWAY {14/2} 7078 1362 CMU-20C {14/3} 0 0 AMES-67 {16/0} 0 0 AMES-TIP {16/2} 0 0 AMES-11 {16/3} 0 0 MITRE0 {17/0} 0 0 MITRE-GATEWAY {17/1} 0 1558012 MITRE-TAC {17/2} 140271 125 COMSAT-MTR {17/3} 97678 4568 RADC-MULTICS {18/0} 2833 1132 RADC-XPER {18/1} 0 0 RADC-TAC {18/2} 50250 1662 RADC-TOPS20 {18/3} 0 0 ROCHESTER {18/4} 0 0 RADC-UNIX {18/5} 0 0 RADC-XMULTICS {18/6} 0 0 NBS-VMS {19/0} 0 0 NBS-SDC {19/1} 0 0 NBS-PL {19/3} 0 10 CCTC {20/0} 0 0 DCEC-GATEWAY {20/1} 93684 8915 DCEC-TAC {20/2} 91842 1907 EDN-UNIX {20/3} 11148 5692 LLL-UNIX {21/0} 0 0 LLL-MFE {21/1} 0 0 ISI-SPEECH11 {22/0} 50 0 USC-ISI {22/1} 414792 0 USC-ISIC {22/2} 0 0 ISI-PSAT {22/3} 8178 0 USC-ECLB {23/0} 382543 1899 USC-ECLC {23/1} 103443 879 USC-TAC {23/2} 10242 138 USC-ECL {23/3} 147923 131 NADC {24/2} 0 0 WHARTON-10 {24/3} 0 0 SEISMO {25/0} 9891 3200 PENTAGON-TIP {26/2} 0 0 USC-ISID {27/0} 674435 2273 ISI-PNG11 {27/1} 22960 2121 ISI-VAXA {27/2} 145453 123 RAND-RELAY {27/3} 0 0 ARPA-DMS {28/0} 0 0 ARPA1-TAC {28/1} 31555 17 ARPA2-TAC {28/2} 113513 20 ARPA-PENGUIN {28/3} 3181 0 BRL {29/0} 0 0 ABER-TAC {29/2} 3359 94 BRL-BMD {29/3} 294 3 BROOKS-TAC {30/0} 467 0 CCA-UNIX {31/0} 0 0 CCA-VMS {31/1} 95 0 CCA-TAC {31/2} 465 0 MIT-DEVMULTICS {31/3} 153 0 PARC-MAXC {32/0} 0 0 KESTREL {32/3} 11 0 NPS0 {33/0} 4777 99 FNOC {33/1} 0 0 NPS-TAC {33/2} 27393 0 FNOC-SECURE {33/3} 13284 103 LBL0 {34/0} 0 0 LBL-UNIX {34/1} 15283 4467 NOSC-SECURE2 {35/0} 116068 19 NOSC-SDL {35/1} 428 3322 ACCAT-TAC {35/2} 215438 3 NOSC-SECURE3 {35/3} 4151 19 COINS-TAS {36/0} 24 1019 CINCPACFLT-WM {36/1} 59237 465 ALOHA-TAC {36/2} 19133 0 PURDUE {37/0} 0 0 CSNET-PURDUE {37/2} 13660 0 BRAGG-GWY1 {38/0} 97935 5593 BRAGG-STA1 {38/1} 0 0 BRAGG-TAC {38/2} 263600 0 NCC-TAC {40/0} 135210 9858 PSAT-GATEWAY {40/1} 0 0 HP-3000 {40/2} 0 0 SATNET-GATEWAY {40/3} 204826 11934 REDST-TAC {41/2} 0 0 OFFICE-1 {43/0} 0 0 OFFICE-2 {43/1} 0 0 OFFICE-3 {43/2} 6 0 OFFICE-7 {43/3} 2831 0 MIT-XX {44/0} 162779 0 LL-ASG {44/1} 0 0 MIT-TSTGW {44/2} 0 0 MIT-MC {44/3} 0 0 COLLINS-PR {46/0} 0 0 COLLNS-TAC {46/2} 12519 0 OKC-UNIX {46/3} 1848 0 WPAFB0 {47/0} 0 0 WPAFB-AFWAL {47/1} 0 0 WPAFB-TIP {47/2} 0 0 AFWL0 {48/0} 0 0 AFWL-TIP {48/2} 0 0 BBNB {49/0} 87318 0 CRONUS-GATEW {49/1} 27909 5535 BBNC {49/3} 97118 0 DARCOM-TAC {50/2} 40687 0 SRI-C3PO {51/1} 72141 17734 SRI-UNIX {51/2} 0 0 SRI-R2D2 {51/3} 86299 14832 ISI-VAXB {52/0} 0 0 USC-ISIE {52/1} 279258 17223 USC-ISIF {52/2} 89846 37614 USC-ISIB {52/3} 66886 38943 AFSC-AD {53/0} 16193 875 NCSC {53/1} 0 0 AFSC-DEV {53/2} 1 979 MARTIN {53/3} 0 0 CIT-20 {54/0} 9424 18957 CIT-VAX {54/1} 941 26514 ACC {54/2} 0 0 JPL-VAX {54/3} 258 160 ANL0 {55/0} 0 0 ANL-MCS {55/1} 0 0 SUMEX-AIM {56/0} 0 0 SU-DSN {56/1} 0 0 TYCHO {57/0} 0 0 COINS-GATEWAY {57/1} 0 0 NYU0 {58/0} 0 0 BNL {58/1} 0 0 RUTGERS {58/2} 0 0 NUSC-NL {58/3} 0 0 ETAC {59/0} 0 0 CENTACS-MMP {60/0} 0 0 CORADCOM-TIP {60/2} 0 0 CENTACS-TF {60/3} 0 0 STLA-TAC {61/2} 44088 0 UTEXAS-11 {62/0} 0 0 UTEXAS-20 {62/1} 0 0 BBN-RSM {63/0} 4162 0 BBN-TAC {63/1} 14272 18 11/40-TESTGATE {63/3} 0 0 TIU-TEST-GATE {63/5} 0 0 VAN-TEST-GATE {63/6} 0 0 MARTIN-B {64/1} 0 0 ROBINS-TAC {64/2} 711 0 ROBINS-UNIX {64/3} 0 0 AFSC-SD {65/0} 0 0 AFSD-TAC {65/1} 29836 1143 AEROSPACE {65/2} 2534 894 MITRE-BEDFORD {66/0} 0 0 AFGL1 {66/1} 0 0 AFGL-TAC {66/2} 16212 10 AFSC-HQ {67/0} 0 0 ANDRWS-TAC {67/1} 1072 41 USGS1-MULTICS {68/0} 0 0 USGS1-AMDAHL {68/2} 0 0 USGS1-TAC {68/3} 356 0 USGS2-MULTICS {69/0} 0 0 USGS2-TAC {69/1} 12911 0 USAFA-GW {69/2} 0 0 USGS3-MULTICS {70/0} 0 0 USGS3-TAC {70/1} 468 2 CLARK-IG {71/1} 7251 0 BBN-CLXX {71/2} 66404 0 BBN-NOC {72/0} 21178 394 BBN-UNIX {72/1} 0 0 BBNP {72/2} 97348 146938 RCCGW {72/3} 298733 134756 SRI-NIC {73/0} 46241 1406 SRI-WARF {73/1} 7296 150 SRI-AI {73/2} 0 0 SRI-IU {73/3} 70 43 WSMR-TAC {74/2} 953 0 YUMA-TAC {75/2} 463 0 MIT-GW {77/0} 82354 3236 MIT-TAC {77/2} 73190 1924 UCB-ARPA {78/0} 4472 0 UCB-C70 {78/1} 0 0 UCB-INGVAX {78/2} 0 0 MCCLELLAN {78/3} 871 0 DEC-2136 {79/0} 0 0 DEC-MARLBORO {79/1} 0 0 HI-MULTICS {80/0} 278 24 SAC-TAC2 {80/1} 0 0 SAC-TAC {80/2} 165960 0 SAC-GW {80/3} 0 0 NALCON {81/0} 0 0 DTNSRDC {81/1} 0 0 DAVID-TAC {81/2} 10288 110 NEMS {81/3} 0 0 BBNT {82/0} 0 0 BBN-VAX {82/1} 48074 211 BBN-INOC {82/2} 9125 0 BBNS {82/3} 203973 2972 BBN-NOC2 {82/6} 2029 2590 NSWC-DL {84/0} 0 0 NSWC-TAC {84/2} 3072 3 NWC-387A {85/0} 0 0 NWC-ELF {85/1} 0 0 CHINA-TAC {85/2} 340 0 NWC-387B {85/3} 0 0 SANDIA0 {87/0} 0 0 NLM-MCS {88/0} 0 0 WASHINGTON0 {91/0} 0 0 WASH-TAC {91/2} 1713 23 UW-VLSI {91/3} 1990 34 NUSC-NPT {92/2} 0 0 OFFICE-8 {93/0} 0 0 OFFICE-10 {93/1} 0 0 UWISC0 {94/0} 0 0 CSNET-SH {94/1} 0 0 S1-GATEWAY {95/0} 3 0 S1-A {95/1} 0 0 S1-B {95/2} 0 0 S1-C {95/3} 0 0 UDEL-RELAY {96/0} 0 0 UDEL-TCP {96/1} 5577 174 UDEL-EE {96/2} 8763 173 PAXRV-TAC {97/3} 466 0 ----MESSAGE-END---- ----MESSAGE-BEGIN---- <1982112420230000> Mail-from: ARPANET host BRL rcvd at 25-Nov-82 0003-PST UUCP-From: decvax!brl-bmd!tcp-ip Sender: Mike Muuss From: TCP-IP at BRL To: TCP-IP at BRL Date: 25 Nov 82 Subject: TCP-IP Digest, Vol 1 #25 Via: Brl-Bmd; 25 Nov 82 1:23-EST TCP/IP Digest Thursday, 25 Nov 1982 Volume 1 : Issue 25 Today's Topics: Needed: 3COM drivers for LD/DH-11 Finger and Echo servers done for BBN VAX UNIX Request for information about TCP implementations SRI-NIC has Digest Archives for FTP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- LIMITED DISTRIBUTION For Research Use Only --- Not for Public Distribution ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Mike Muuss Subject: Decrease in submissions Due to a serious decrease in submissions, this issue and subsequent issues will be sent out as soon as possible, rather than waiting for a while to "batch" together messages. I suppose everybody is too busy setting up their TCP code to send messages.... Good Luck....TCP only day is near! -Mike ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1982 1411-EST From: Graham Campbell To: Unix-wizards at Sri-Csl, TCP-IP at BRL Subject: 3COM TCP/IP drivers Does anyone have the system interface code and drivers for Unix v7 to fit between 3COM TCP/IP and an LH/DH 11? Obviously we need it before Jan 1. ------------------------------ Date: 31 Oct 1982 15:15:35-EST From: Christopher A. Kent To: tcp-ip@brl Subject: Finger and echo servers for BBN VAX TCP/IP Just wanted to post a short note to let folks running the BBN TCP/IP for the VAX that we've written finger and echo servers, and that anyone who wants a copy is welcome to them. Cheers, chris ------------------------------ Date: 24 Nov 1982 1718-EST From: Seshashayee Murthy Subject: Re: TCP-IP Digest, Vol 1 #24 To: TCP-IP at BRL I would like to find out the following information about TCP implementations. - How many different implementations of TCP exist. - In which language have they been implemented. Approximately how many lines of code are there in the implementation. - On which computers have they been implemented. - How much memory and processing power do they require. If you send the replies directly to me I will post my findings back on the list. Thanks in advance Sesh ------------------------------ From: Mike Muuss Subject: TCP-IP Digest Archive I have been informed by the NIC that they now have a directory [SRI-NIC] where they have complete archives of the digest to date. The NIC is host 10.0.0.73 and supports anonymous NCP FTP. ------------------------------ END OF TCP-IP DIGEST ******************** ----MESSAGE-END---- ----MESSAGE-BEGIN---- [bnews.brl-bmd.454] <1982112622021900> Message-ID: Newsgroups: fa.tcp-ip X-Path: utzoo!decvax!harpo!duke!unc!brl-bmd!TCP-IP@BRL From: TCP-IP@BRL Date: Sat Nov 27 03:02:19 1982 Subject: TCP-IP Digest, Vol 1 #25 X-Google-Info: Converted from the original B-News header Posted: Thu Nov 25 01:49:46 1982 Received: Sat Nov 27 03:02:19 1982 Expires: Thu Nov 25 01:00:00 1982 TCP/IP Digest Thursday, 25 Nov 1982 Volume 1 : Issue 25 Today's Topics: Needed: 3COM drivers for LD/DH-11 Finger and Echo servers done for BBN VAX UNIX Request for information about TCP implementations SRI-NIC has Digest Archives for FTP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- LIMITED DISTRIBUTION For Research Use Only --- Not for Public Distribution ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Mike Muuss Subject: Decrease in submissions Due to a serious decrease in submissions, this issue and subsequent issues will be sent out as soon as possible, rather than waiting for a while to "batch" together messages. I suppose everybody is too busy setting up their TCP code to send messages.... Good Luck....TCP only day is near! -Mike ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1982 1411-EST From: Graham Campbell To: Unix-wizards at Sri-Csl, TCP-IP at BRL Subject: 3COM TCP/IP drivers Does anyone have the system interface code and drivers for Unix v7 to fit between 3COM TCP/IP and an LH/DH 11? Obviously we need it before Jan 1. ------------------------------ Date: 31 Oct 1982 15:15:35-EST From: Christopher A. Kent To: tcp-ip@brl Subject: Finger and echo servers for BBN VAX TCP/IP Just wanted to post a short note to let folks running the BBN TCP/IP for the VAX that we've written finger and echo servers, and that anyone who wants a copy is welcome to them. Cheers, chris ------------------------------ Date: 24 Nov 1982 1718-EST From: Seshashayee Murthy Subject: Re: TCP-IP Digest, Vol 1 #24 To: TCP-IP at BRL I would like to find out the following information about TCP implementations. - How many different implementations of TCP exist. - In which language have they been implemented. Approximately how many lines of code are there in the implementation. - On which computers have they been implemented. - How much memory and processing power do they require. If you send the replies directly to me I will post my findings back on the list. Thanks in advance Sesh ------------------------------ From: Mike Muuss Subject: TCP-IP Digest Archive I have been informed by the NIC that they now have a directory [SRI-NIC] where they have complete archives of the digest to date. The NIC is host 10.0.0.73 and supports anonymous NCP FTP. ------------------------------ END OF TCP-IP DIGEST ******************** ----MESSAGE-END---- ----MESSAGE-BEGIN---- <1982112915310000> Mail-from: ARPANET host BRL rcvd at 30-Nov-82 0104-PST UUCP-From: decvax!brl-bmd!tcp-ip Sender: Mike Muuss From: TCP-IP at BRL To: TCP-IP at BRL Date: 29 Nov 1982 Subject: TCP-IP Digest, Vol 1 #26 Via: Brl-Bmd; 29 Nov 82 20:31-EST TCP/IP Digest Monday, 29 Nov 1982 Volume 1 : Issue 26 Today's Topics: Request for TCP-IP above X.25 implementation? Implementation Information Source Host Throughput Results for 15-Nov TCP Only Tests ---------------------------------------------------------------------- LIMITED DISTRIBUTION For Research Use Only --- Not for Public Distribution ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 29 Nov 1982 0651-EST From: Marc Shapiro Subject: X25 / Request for information To: tcp-ip at BRL Are there any usable implemetations of either TCP-IP or just TCP above X.25 for the following systems: DEC-20 (Tops-20) Vax (unix) Multics Reply to shapiro@mit-xx PS. I am not on the Tcp-IP list. [ Such an implementation has been done by the CSNET folks for VAX UNIX. Try Chris Kent . -Mike ] ------------------------------ Date: 26 Nov 1982 1155-PST From: POSTEL at Usc-Isif Subject: Information about Implementations To: Murthy at Cmu-Cs-C cc: TCp-IP at BRL Sesh: The Network Information Center keeps a file of such information. It is TCP-IP-STATUS.TXT on the SRI-NIC host. Please copy it via FTP. --jon. ------------------------------ Date: 25 Nov 1982 9:25:11 EST (Thursday) From: Andrew Malis Subject: Host throughput results for 11/15/82 TCP-only test To: tcp-ip at BRL As you all must know, the ARPANET had a 24-hour TCP only test on 11/15. On that day, The total ARPANET throughput was 9,466,256 packets. This is 62% of the total throughput for the previous Monday, 11/8, when 15,283,672 packets were passed by the net. The following data presents the host-by-host throughput breakdown for the 15th. Note that the starting time for the data is 00:48 EST; since the IMPs weren't completely disabled for NCP until 00:10 or so, the first recording interval for the data has been discarded. Hosts that were only running NCP (or were down for the period) will have zeros in both columns. Also note that IMPs 33, 35, and 36 had NCP enabled during the test, for a Navy exercise. Regards, Andy Malis For the NOC ---------------------------------------------------------------- Host Throughput From Mon Nov 15 00:48:56 1982 To Tue Nov 16 00:00:03 1982 Host Name {node/ Packets Sent host} Inter-Node Intra-Node UCLA-ATS { 1/0} 0 0 UCLA-CCN { 1/1} 522 1587 UCLA-SECURITY { 1/2} 0 0 UCLA-LOCUS { 1/3} 648 0 SRI-NSC11 { 2/0} 0 0 SRI-KL { 2/1} 0 0 SRI-CSL { 2/2} 0 0 SRI-TSC { 2/3} 0 0 NOSC-CC { 3/0} 0 0 NOSC-SPEL { 3/1} 0 0 LOGICON { 3/2} 0 0 NPRDC { 3/3} 0 0 UTAH-CS { 4/0} 0 0 UTAH-TAC { 4/2} 470 0 UTAH-20 { 4/3} 0 0 BBNF { 5/0} 8698 31577 BBNG { 5/1} 55864 12195 BBN-PTIP { 5/2} 49579 68004 BBNA { 5/3} 5504 13730 MIT-MULTICS { 6/0} 32083 0 MIT-DMS { 6/1} 0 0 MIT-AI { 6/2} 0 0 MIT-ML { 6/3} 0 0 RAND-AI { 7/0} 0 0 RAND-RELAY { 7/1} 0 0 RAND-TAC { 7/2} 5174 0 RAND-UNIX { 7/3} 0 0 NRL0 { 8/0} 0 0 NSWC-WO { 8/2} 0 0 NRL-TOPS10 { 8/3} 0 0 NRL-ARCTAN { 8/6} 0 0 NRL-CSS { 8/7} 0 0 HARV-10 { 9/0} 0 0 YALE { 9/2} 0 0 LL {10/0} 0 0 LL-TCP {10/1} 107 0 LL-XN {10/2} 0 0 LL-11 {10/3} 1717 0 SU-AI {11/0} 0 0 STAN-TAC {11/2} 63961 16 SU-SCORE {11/3} 0 0 DTI-VMS {12/0} 2810 199 DTI0 {12/1} 0 0 GUNTER-UNIX {13/0} 0 0 GUNTER-ADM {13/1} 32378 231372 GUNTER-TAC {13/2} 5862 207057 CMU-10B {14/0} 0 0 CMU-10A {14/1} 19 6049 CMU-GATEWAY {14/2} 7078 1362 CMU-20C {14/3} 0 0 AMES-67 {16/0} 0 0 AMES-TIP {16/2} 0 0 AMES-11 {16/3} 0 0 MITRE0 {17/0} 0 0 MITRE-GATEWAY {17/1} 0 1558012 MITRE-TAC {17/2} 140271 125 COMSAT-MTR {17/3} 97678 4568 RADC-MULTICS {18/0} 2833 1132 RADC-XPER {18/1} 0 0 RADC-TAC {18/2} 50250 1662 RADC-TOPS20 {18/3} 0 0 ROCHESTER {18/4} 0 0 RADC-UNIX {18/5} 0 0 RADC-XMULTICS {18/6} 0 0 NBS-VMS {19/0} 0 0 NBS-SDC {19/1} 0 0 NBS-PL {19/3} 0 10 CCTC {20/0} 0 0 DCEC-GATEWAY {20/1} 93684 8915 DCEC-TAC {20/2} 91842 1907 EDN-UNIX {20/3} 11148 5692 LLL-UNIX {21/0} 0 0 LLL-MFE {21/1} 0 0 ISI-SPEECH11 {22/0} 50 0 USC-ISI {22/1} 414792 0 USC-ISIC {22/2} 0 0 ISI-PSAT {22/3} 8178 0 USC-ECLB {23/0} 382543 1899 USC-ECLC {23/1} 103443 879 USC-TAC {23/2} 10242 138 USC-ECL {23/3} 147923 131 NADC {24/2} 0 0 WHARTON-10 {24/3} 0 0 SEISMO {25/0} 9891 3200 PENTAGON-TIP {26/2} 0 0 USC-ISID {27/0} 674435 2273 ISI-PNG11 {27/1} 22960 2121 ISI-VAXA {27/2} 145453 123 RAND-RELAY {27/3} 0 0 ARPA-DMS {28/0} 0 0 ARPA1-TAC {28/1} 31555 17 ARPA2-TAC {28/2} 113513 20 ARPA-PENGUIN {28/3} 3181 0 BRL {29/0} 0 0 ABER-TAC {29/2} 3359 94 BRL-BMD {29/3} 294 3 BROOKS-TAC {30/0} 467 0 CCA-UNIX {31/0} 0 0 CCA-VMS {31/1} 95 0 CCA-TAC {31/2} 465 0 MIT-DEVMULTICS {31/3} 153 0 PARC-MAXC {32/0} 0 0 KESTREL {32/3} 11 0 NPS0 {33/0} 4777 99 FNOC {33/1} 0 0 NPS-TAC {33/2} 27393 0 FNOC-SECURE {33/3} 13284 103 LBL0 {34/0} 0 0 LBL-UNIX {34/1} 15283 4467 NOSC-SECURE2 {35/0} 116068 19 NOSC-SDL {35/1} 428 3322 ACCAT-TAC {35/2} 215438 3 NOSC-SECURE3 {35/3} 4151 19 COINS-TAS {36/0} 24 1019 CINCPACFLT-WM {36/1} 59237 465 ALOHA-TAC {36/2} 19133 0 PURDUE {37/0} 0 0 CSNET-PURDUE {37/2} 13660 0 BRAGG-GWY1 {38/0} 97935 5593 BRAGG-STA1 {38/1} 0 0 BRAGG-TAC {38/2} 263600 0 NCC-TAC {40/0} 135210 9858 PSAT-GATEWAY {40/1} 0 0 HP-3000 {40/2} 0 0 SATNET-GATEWAY {40/3} 204826 11934 REDST-TAC {41/2} 0 0 OFFICE-1 {43/0} 0 0 OFFICE-2 {43/1} 0 0 OFFICE-3 {43/2} 6 0 OFFICE-7 {43/3} 2831 0 MIT-XX {44/0} 162779 0 LL-ASG {44/1} 0 0 MIT-TSTGW {44/2} 0 0 MIT-MC {44/3} 0 0 COLLINS-PR {46/0} 0 0 COLLNS-TAC {46/2} 12519 0 OKC-UNIX {46/3} 1848 0 WPAFB0 {47/0} 0 0 WPAFB-AFWAL {47/1} 0 0 WPAFB-TIP {47/2} 0 0 AFWL0 {48/0} 0 0 AFWL-TIP {48/2} 0 0 BBNB {49/0} 87318 0 CRONUS-GATEW {49/1} 27909 5535 BBNC {49/3} 97118 0 DARCOM-TAC {50/2} 40687 0 SRI-C3PO {51/1} 72141 17734 SRI-UNIX {51/2} 0 0 SRI-R2D2 {51/3} 86299 14832 ISI-VAXB {52/0} 0 0 USC-ISIE {52/1} 279258 17223 USC-ISIF {52/2} 89846 37614 USC-ISIB {52/3} 66886 38943 AFSC-AD {53/0} 16193 875 NCSC {53/1} 0 0 AFSC-DEV {53/2} 1 979 MARTIN {53/3} 0 0 CIT-20 {54/0} 9424 18957 CIT-VAX {54/1} 941 26514 ACC {54/2} 0 0 JPL-VAX {54/3} 258 160 ANL0 {55/0} 0 0 ANL-MCS {55/1} 0 0 SUMEX-AIM {56/0} 0 0 SU-DSN {56/1} 0 0 TYCHO {57/0} 0 0 COINS-GATEWAY {57/1} 0 0 NYU0 {58/0} 0 0 BNL {58/1} 0 0 RUTGERS {58/2} 0 0 NUSC-NL {58/3} 0 0 ETAC {59/0} 0 0 CENTACS-MMP {60/0} 0 0 CORADCOM-TIP {60/2} 0 0 CENTACS-TF {60/3} 0 0 STLA-TAC {61/2} 44088 0 UTEXAS-11 {62/0} 0 0 UTEXAS-20 {62/1} 0 0 BBN-RSM {63/0} 4162 0 BBN-TAC {63/1} 14272 18 11/40-TESTGATE {63/3} 0 0 TIU-TEST-GATE {63/5} 0 0 VAN-TEST-GATE {63/6} 0 0 MARTIN-B {64/1} 0 0 ROBINS-TAC {64/2} 711 0 ROBINS-UNIX {64/3} 0 0 AFSC-SD {65/0} 0 0 AFSD-TAC {65/1} 29836 1143 AEROSPACE {65/2} 2534 894 MITRE-BEDFORD {66/0} 0 0 AFGL1 {66/1} 0 0 AFGL-TAC {66/2} 16212 10 AFSC-HQ {67/0} 0 0 ANDRWS-TAC {67/1} 1072 41 USGS1-MULTICS {68/0} 0 0 USGS1-AMDAHL {68/2} 0 0 USGS1-TAC {68/3} 356 0 USGS2-MULTICS {69/0} 0 0 USGS2-TAC {69/1} 12911 0 USAFA-GW {69/2} 0 0 USGS3-MULTICS {70/0} 0 0 USGS3-TAC {70/1} 468 2 CLARK-IG {71/1} 7251 0 BBN-CLXX {71/2} 66404 0 BBN-NOC {72/0} 21178 394 BBN-UNIX {72/1} 0 0 BBNP {72/2} 97348 146938 RCCGW {72/3} 298733 134756 SRI-NIC {73/0} 46241 1406 SRI-WARF {73/1} 7296 150 SRI-AI {73/2} 0 0 SRI-IU {73/3} 70 43 WSMR-TAC {74/2} 953 0 YUMA-TAC {75/2} 463 0 MIT-GW {77/0} 82354 3236 MIT-TAC {77/2} 73190 1924 UCB-ARPA {78/0} 4472 0 UCB-C70 {78/1} 0 0 UCB-INGVAX {78/2} 0 0 MCCLELLAN {78/3} 871 0 DEC-2136 {79/0} 0 0 DEC-MARLBORO {79/1} 0 0 HI-MULTICS {80/0} 278 24 SAC-TAC2 {80/1} 0 0 SAC-TAC {80/2} 165960 0 SAC-GW {80/3} 0 0 NALCON {81/0} 0 0 DTNSRDC {81/1} 0 0 DAVID-TAC {81/2} 10288 110 NEMS {81/3} 0 0 BBNT {82/0} 0 0 BBN-VAX {82/1} 48074 211 BBN-INOC {82/2} 9125 0 BBNS {82/3} 203973 2972 BBN-NOC2 {82/6} 2029 2590 NSWC-DL {84/0} 0 0 NSWC-TAC {84/2} 3072 3 NWC-387A {85/0} 0 0 NWC-ELF {85/1} 0 0 CHINA-TAC {85/2} 340 0 NWC-387B {85/3} 0 0 SANDIA0 {87/0} 0 0 NLM-MCS {88/0} 0 0 WASHINGTON0 {91/0} 0 0 WASH-TAC {91/2} 1713 23 UW-VLSI {91/3} 1990 34 NUSC-NPT {92/2} 0 0 OFFICE-8 {93/0} 0 0 OFFICE-10 {93/1} 0 0 UWISC0 {94/0} 0 0 CSNET-SH {94/1} 0 0 S1-GATEWAY {95/0} 3 0 S1-A {95/1} 0 0 S1-B {95/2} 0 0 S1-C {95/3} 0 0 UDEL-RELAY {96/0} 0 0 UDEL-TCP {96/1} 5577 174 UDEL-EE {96/2} 8763 173 PAXRV-TAC {97/3} 466 0 ------------------------------ END OF TCP-IP DIGEST ******************** ----MESSAGE-END---- ----MESSAGE-BEGIN---- [bnews.brl-bmd.460] <1982112923165400> Message-ID: Newsgroups: fa.tcp-ip X-Path: utzoo!decvax!harpo!duke!unc!brl-bmd!TCP-IP@BRL From: TCP-IP@BRL Date: Tue Nov 30 04:16:54 1982 Subject: TCP-IP Digest, Vol 1 #26 X-Google-Info: Converted from the original B-News header Posted: Mon Nov 29 21:58:18 1982 Received: Tue Nov 30 04:16:54 1982 Expires: Mon Nov 29 01:00:00 1982 TCP/IP Digest Monday, 29 Nov 1982 Volume 1 : Issue 26 Today's Topics: Request for TCP-IP above X.25 implementation? Implementation Information Source Host Throughput Results for 15-Nov TCP Only Tests ---------------------------------------------------------------------- LIMITED DISTRIBUTION For Research Use Only --- Not for Public Distribution ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 29 Nov 1982 0651-EST From: Marc Shapiro Subject: X25 / Request for information To: tcp-ip at BRL Are there any usable implemetations of either TCP-IP or just TCP above X.25 for the following systems: DEC-20 (Tops-20) Vax (unix) Multics Reply to shapiro@mit-xx PS. I am not on the Tcp-IP list. [ Such an implementation has been done by the CSNET folks for VAX UNIX. Try Chris Kent . -Mike ] ------------------------------ Date: 26 Nov 1982 1155-PST From: POSTEL at Usc-Isif Subject: Information about Implementations To: Murthy at Cmu-Cs-C cc: TCp-IP at BRL Sesh: The Network Information Center keeps a file of such information. It is TCP-IP-STATUS.TXT on the SRI-NIC host. Please copy it via FTP. --jon. ------------------------------ Date: 25 Nov 1982 9:25:11 EST (Thursday) From: Andrew Malis Subject: Host throughput results for 11/15/82 TCP-only test To: tcp-ip at BRL As you all must know, the ARPANET had a 24-hour TCP only test on 11/15. On that day, The total ARPANET throughput was 9,466,256 packets. This is 62% of the total throughput for the previous Monday, 11/8, when 15,283,672 packets were passed by the net. The following data presents the host-by-host throughput breakdown for the 15th. Note that the starting time for the data is 00:48 EST; since the IMPs weren't completely disabled for NCP until 00:10 or so, the first recording interval for the data has been discarded. Hosts that were only running NCP (or were down for the period) will have zeros in both columns. Also note that IMPs 33, 35, and 36 had NCP enabled during the test, for a Navy exercise. Regards, Andy Malis For the NOC ---------------------------------------------------------------- Host Throughput From Mon Nov 15 00:48:56 1982 To Tue Nov 16 00:00:03 1982 Host Name {node/ Packets Sent host} Inter-Node Intra-Node UCLA-ATS { 1/0} 0 0 UCLA-CCN { 1/1} 522 1587 UCLA-SECURITY { 1/2} 0 0 UCLA-LOCUS { 1/3} 648 0 SRI-NSC11 { 2/0} 0 0 SRI-KL { 2/1} 0 0 SRI-CSL { 2/2} 0 0 SRI-TSC { 2/3} 0 0 NOSC-CC { 3/0} 0 0 NOSC-SPEL { 3/1} 0 0 LOGICON { 3/2} 0 0 NPRDC { 3/3} 0 0 UTAH-CS { 4/0} 0 0 UTAH-TAC { 4/2} 470 0 UTAH-20 { 4/3} 0 0 BBNF { 5/0} 8698 31577 BBNG { 5/1} 55864 12195 BBN-PTIP { 5/2} 49579 68004 BBNA { 5/3} 5504 13730 MIT-MULTICS { 6/0} 32083 0 MIT-DMS { 6/1} 0 0 MIT-AI { 6/2} 0 0 MIT-ML { 6/3} 0 0 RAND-AI { 7/0} 0 0 RAND-RELAY { 7/1} 0 0 RAND-TAC { 7/2} 5174 0 RAND-UNIX { 7/3} 0 0 NRL0 { 8/0} 0 0 NSWC-WO { 8/2} 0 0 NRL-TOPS10 { 8/3} 0 0 NRL-ARCTAN { 8/6} 0 0 NRL-CSS { 8/7} 0 0 HARV-10 { 9/0} 0 0 YALE { 9/2} 0 0 LL {10/0} 0 0 LL-TCP {10/1} 107 0 LL-XN {10/2} 0 0 LL-11 {10/3} 1717 0 SU-AI {11/0} 0 0 STAN-TAC {11/2} 63961 16 SU-SCORE {11/3} 0 0 DTI-VMS {12/0} 2810 199 DTI0 {12/1} 0 0 GUNTER-UNIX {13/0} 0 0 GUNTER-ADM {13/1} 32378 231372 GUNTER-TAC {13/2} 5862 207057 CMU-10B {14/0} 0 0 CMU-10A {14/1} 19 6049 CMU-GATEWAY {14/2} 7078 1362 CMU-20C {14/3} 0 0 AMES-67 {16/0} 0 0 AMES-TIP {16/2} 0 0 AMES-11 {16/3} 0 0 MITRE0 {17/0} 0 0 MITRE-GATEWAY {17/1} 0 1558012 MITRE-TAC {17/2} 140271 125 COMSAT-MTR {17/3} 97678 4568 RADC-MULTICS {18/0} 2833 1132 RADC-XPER {18/1} 0 0 RADC-TAC {18/2} 50250 1662 RADC-TOPS20 {18/3} 0 0 ROCHESTER {18/4} 0 0 RADC-UNIX {18/5} 0 0 RADC-XMULTICS {18/6} 0 0 NBS-VMS {19/0} 0 0 NBS-SDC {19/1} 0 0 NBS-PL {19/3} 0 10 CCTC {20/0} 0 0 DCEC-GATEWAY {20/1} 93684 8915 DCEC-TAC {20/2} 91842 1907 EDN-UNIX {20/3} 11148 5692 LLL-UNIX {21/0} 0 0 LLL-MFE {21/1} 0 0 ISI-SPEECH11 {22/0} 50 0 USC-ISI {22/1} 414792 0 USC-ISIC {22/2} 0 0 ISI-PSAT {22/3} 8178 0 USC-ECLB {23/0} 382543 1899 USC-ECLC {23/1} 103443 879 USC-TAC {23/2} 10242 138 USC-ECL {23/3} 147923 131 NADC {24/2} 0 0 WHARTON-10 {24/3} 0 0 SEISMO {25/0} 9891 3200 PENTAGON-TIP {26/2} 0 0 USC-ISID {27/0} 674435 2273 ISI-PNG11 {27/1} 22960 2121 ISI-VAXA {27/2} 145453 123 RAND-RELAY {27/3} 0 0 ARPA-DMS {28/0} 0 0 ARPA1-TAC {28/1} 31555 17 ARPA2-TAC {28/2} 113513 20 ARPA-PENGUIN {28/3} 3181 0 BRL {29/0} 0 0 ABER-TAC {29/2} 3359 94 BRL-BMD {29/3} 294 3 BROOKS-TAC {30/0} 467 0 CCA-UNIX {31/0} 0 0 CCA-VMS {31/1} 95 0 CCA-TAC {31/2} 465 0 MIT-DEVMULTICS {31/3} 153 0 PARC-MAXC {32/0} 0 0 KESTREL {32/3} 11 0 NPS0 {33/0} 4777 99 FNOC {33/1} 0 0 NPS-TAC {33/2} 27393 0 FNOC-SECURE {33/3} 13284 103 LBL0 {34/0} 0 0 LBL-UNIX {34/1} 15283 4467 NOSC-SECURE2 {35/0} 116068 19 NOSC-SDL {35/1} 428 3322 ACCAT-TAC {35/2} 215438 3 NOSC-SECURE3 {35/3} 4151 19 COINS-TAS {36/0} 24 1019 CINCPACFLT-WM {36/1} 59237 465 ALOHA-TAC {36/2} 19133 0 PURDUE {37/0} 0 0 CSNET-PURDUE {37/2} 13660 0 BRAGG-GWY1 {38/0} 97935 5593 BRAGG-STA1 {38/1} 0 0 BRAGG-TAC {38/2} 263600 0 NCC-TAC {40/0} 135210 9858 PSAT-GATEWAY {40/1} 0 0 HP-3000 {40/2} 0 0 SATNET-GATEWAY {40/3} 204826 11934 REDST-TAC {41/2} 0 0 OFFICE-1 {43/0} 0 0 OFFICE-2 {43/1} 0 0 OFFICE-3 {43/2} 6 0 OFFICE-7 {43/3} 2831 0 MIT-XX {44/0} 162779 0 LL-ASG {44/1} 0 0 MIT-TSTGW {44/2} 0 0 MIT-MC {44/3} 0 0 COLLINS-PR {46/0} 0 0 COLLNS-TAC {46/2} 12519 0 OKC-UNIX {46/3} 1848 0 WPAFB0 {47/0} 0 0 WPAFB-AFWAL {47/1} 0 0 WPAFB-TIP {47/2} 0 0 AFWL0 {48/0} 0 0 AFWL-TIP {48/2} 0 0 BBNB {49/0} 87318 0 CRONUS-GATEW {49/1} 27909 5535 BBNC {49/3} 97118 0 DARCOM-TAC {50/2} 40687 0 SRI-C3PO {51/1} 72141 17734 SRI-UNIX {51/2} 0 0 SRI-R2D2 {51/3} 86299 14832 ISI-VAXB {52/0} 0 0 USC-ISIE {52/1} 279258 17223 USC-ISIF {52/2} 89846 37614 USC-ISIB {52/3} 66886 38943 AFSC-AD {53/0} 16193 875 NCSC {53/1} 0 0 AFSC-DEV {53/2} 1 979 MARTIN {53/3} 0 0 CIT-20 {54/0} 9424 18957 CIT-VAX {54/1} 941 26514 ACC {54/2} 0 0 JPL-VAX {54/3} 258 160 ANL0 {55/0} 0 0 ANL-MCS {55/1} 0 0 SUMEX-AIM {56/0} 0 0 SU-DSN {56/1} 0 0 TYCHO {57/0} 0 0 COINS-GATEWAY {57/1} 0 0 NYU0 {58/0} 0 0 BNL {58/1} 0 0 RUTGERS {58/2} 0 0 NUSC-NL {58/3} 0 0 ETAC {59/0} 0 0 CENTACS-MMP {60/0} 0 0 CORADCOM-TIP {60/2} 0 0 CENTACS-TF {60/3} 0 0 STLA-TAC {61/2} 44088 0 UTEXAS-11 {62/0} 0 0 UTEXAS-20 {62/1} 0 0 BBN-RSM {63/0} 4162 0 BBN-TAC {63/1} 14272 18 11/40-TESTGATE {63/3} 0 0 TIU-TEST-GATE {63/5} 0 0 VAN-TEST-GATE {63/6} 0 0 MARTIN-B {64/1} 0 0 ROBINS-TAC {64/2} 711 0 ROBINS-UNIX {64/3} 0 0 AFSC-SD {65/0} 0 0 AFSD-TAC {65/1} 29836 1143 AEROSPACE {65/2} 2534 894 MITRE-BEDFORD {66/0} 0 0 AFGL1 {66/1} 0 0 AFGL-TAC {66/2} 16212 10 AFSC-HQ {67/0} 0 0 ANDRWS-TAC {67/1} 1072 41 USGS1-MULTICS {68/0} 0 0 USGS1-AMDAHL {68/2} 0 0 USGS1-TAC {68/3} 356 0 USGS2-MULTICS {69/0} 0 0 USGS2-TAC {69/1} 12911 0 USAFA-GW {69/2} 0 0 USGS3-MULTICS {70/0} 0 0 USGS3-TAC {70/1} 468 2 CLARK-IG {71/1} 7251 0 BBN-CLXX {71/2} 66404 0 BBN-NOC {72/0} 21178 394 BBN-UNIX {72/1} 0 0 BBNP {72/2} 97348 146938 RCCGW {72/3} 298733 134756 SRI-NIC {73/0} 46241 1406 SRI-WARF {73/1} 7296 150 SRI-AI {73/2} 0 0 SRI-IU {73/3} 70 43 WSMR-TAC {74/2} 953 0 YUMA-TAC {75/2} 463 0 MIT-GW {77/0} 82354 3236 MIT-TAC {77/2} 73190 1924 UCB-ARPA {78/0} 4472 0 UCB-C70 {78/1} 0 0 UCB-INGVAX {78/2} 0 0 MCCLELLAN {78/3} 871 0 DEC-2136 {79/0} 0 0 DEC-MARLBORO {79/1} 0 0 HI-MULTICS {80/0} 278 24 SAC-TAC2 {80/1} 0 0 SAC-TAC {80/2} 165960 0 SAC-GW {80/3} 0 0 NALCON {81/0} 0 0 DTNSRDC {81/1} 0 0 DAVID-TAC {81/2} 10288 110 NEMS {81/3} 0 0 BBNT {82/0} 0 0 BBN-VAX {82/1} 48074 211 BBN-INOC {82/2} 9125 0 BBNS {82/3} 203973 2972 BBN-NOC2 {82/6} 2029 2590 NSWC-DL {84/0} 0 0 NSWC-TAC {84/2} 3072 3 NWC-387A {85/0} 0 0 NWC-ELF {85/1} 0 0 CHINA-TAC {85/2} 340 0 NWC-387B {85/3} 0 0 SANDIA0 {87/0} 0 0 NLM-MCS {88/0} 0 0 WASHINGTON0 {91/0} 0 0 WASH-TAC {91/2} 1713 23 UW-VLSI {91/3} 1990 34 NUSC-NPT {92/2} 0 0 OFFICE-8 {93/0} 0 0 OFFICE-10 {93/1} 0 0 UWISC0 {94/0} 0 0 CSNET-SH {94/1} 0 0 S1-GATEWAY {95/0} 3 0 S1-A {95/1} 0 0 S1-B {95/2} 0 0 S1-C {95/3} 0 0 UDEL-RELAY {96/0} 0 0 UDEL-TCP {96/1} 5577 174 UDEL-EE {96/2} 8763 173 PAXRV-TAC {97/3} 466 0 ------------------------------ END OF TCP-IP DIGEST ******************** ----MESSAGE-END----